Planned downtime: Harddrive replacement (again)

Announcements about major changes in Haven & Hearth.

Re: Planned downtime: Harddrive replacement (again)

Postby chocolaterain » Fri Jun 29, 2012 11:56 am

mvgulik wrote:
chocolaterain wrote:I think the lag also depends on how far away you live from the server. I have almost no lag right now.

... Really! ...
Your location: Unkown.
Online User-count at moment "right now": Unkown.
Playing duration of test: Unkown.
Type of lag in question (see Doness post): Unkown
Math: Unkown by Unkown by Unkown by Unkown = ... Erm, right. Good for you? ...

---

Loftar is playing with the minimap on/off switches. Thats all.
(Use Ender client. It has bare, but auto generated minimap feature. In case the server is not sending those other ones.)

I basically stated that the location "might" affect lag.
what a b e a u t i f u l duwang
User avatar
chocolaterain
 
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:35 am

Re: Planned downtime: Harddrive replacement (again)

Postby mvgulik » Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:02 pm

chocolaterain wrote:I basically stated that the location "might" affect lag.

I though I "actually" stated that you should read Doness post ...
mvgulik wrote:Type of lag in question (see Doness post): Unkown
Yep I did. ( <-- basically stating: I don't really care. To many useless "I have no lag, go figure." comments in this topic.)
mvgulik
 
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 2:29 am

Re: Planned downtime: Harddrive replacement (again)

Postby benedikt » Sat Jun 30, 2012 9:11 pm

chocolaterain wrote:Is there something wrong with the maps?


well, all my map scrolls are empty, so i would think so
benedikt
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: Planned downtime: Harddrive replacement (again)

Postby Granger » Mon Jul 16, 2012 12:41 am

loftar wrote:
GreenScape wrote:ZFS
I don't know how ZFS is in that regard.

There is a ZFS port for Linux in the making (http://zfsonlinux.org/), which withstood all misuse i threw at it (adding defective harddrives, yanking the power cord) without any on-disk corruption (minus the bad blocks on the failing drives, but they were cured from the redundancy i configured into the pool layouts).

To get most out of it you surely want to give it something to work with: enough spindles (for redundancy and throughput), RAM for the ARC (Adaptive Replacement Cache), SSDs for the L2ARC (to extended ARC when the working set dosn't fit into RAM), and in case you have workloads like databases which fsync (=request data being on stable storage before returning from system call) you want to add another SSD (or a battery backed RAM drive) as ZIL (ZFS Intent Log) so sync writes will not have to wait for rotating platterns.

Surely ZFS eats more resources than a standard desktop filsystem, but that's ok since you'll obtain a feature rich, resilitent and performing datacenter level storage.

IMHO when it comes to manageable data storage ZFS is the best since bread in slices.
⁎ Mon Mar 22, 2010 ✝ Thu Jan 23, 2020
User avatar
Granger
 
Posts: 9263
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 2:00 pm

Previous

Return to Announcements

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests

cron