kLauE wrote:play farmville if u dont like pvp
hahahaha!! thats a good one!

kLauE wrote:play farmville if u dont like pvp
MikeySix wrote:kLauE wrote:play farmville if u dont like pvp
Oh boy here we go, the common retort against people who might not enjoy pvp.
Get fucked, dude.
Khamatus wrote:I dont know about you, but every game that gone p2p while not being too popular or got much attention became freemium in 2 months after launching with 10 people online in the prime time of a sunday
Haven and Hearth is not exactly a marketed game...
MikeySix wrote:Khamatus wrote:I dont know about you, but every game that gone p2p while not being too popular or got much attention became freemium in 2 months after launching with 10 people online in the prime time of a sunday
Haven and Hearth is not exactly a marketed game...
That's true I guess, but poster above you had some good points. 5-10 dollars a month really is nothing. Lunch costs more.
And becoming an item-mall game would attract the very worst sort of players there are. LAZIES.
SacreDoom wrote:MikeySix wrote:Khamatus wrote:I dont know about you, but every game that gone p2p while not being too popular or got much attention became freemium in 2 months after launching with 10 people online in the prime time of a sunday
Haven and Hearth is not exactly a marketed game...
That's true I guess, but poster above you had some good points. 5-10 dollars a month really is nothing. Lunch costs more.
And becoming an item-mall game would attract the very worst sort of players there are. LAZIES.
You friggen eat a sandwich, you can't eat a video game, but that would be pretty cool. But seriously, the idea of paying for some pixels on a screen's just wrong :/
SacreDoom wrote:MikeySix wrote:Khamatus wrote:I dont know about you, but every game that gone p2p while not being too popular or got much attention became freemium in 2 months after launching with 10 people online in the prime time of a sunday
Haven and Hearth is not exactly a marketed game...
That's true I guess, but poster above you had some good points. 5-10 dollars a month really is nothing. Lunch costs more.
And becoming an item-mall game would attract the very worst sort of players there are. LAZIES.
You friggen eat a sandwich, you can't eat a video game, but that would be pretty cool. But seriously, the idea of paying for some pixels on a screen's just wrong :/
RXM9600 wrote:
How is it wrong? It has been the norm since the arcades-you paid a quarter to watch pixels on the screen.
Also buying any other video game is paying to watch pixels on the screen. Buying a single movie is likely more than a months subscription and that is paying to watch pixels on a screen.
I am all up for monthly subscription but HATE the item-mall premise. Paying extra so you receive exp-boosting items and getting ahead of everyone else is not fair.
Users browsing this forum: BLEX [Bot], Claude [Bot], Yandex [Bot] and 4 guests