Request for a State of the Hearth Address

General discussion and socializing.

Re: Request for a State of the Hearth Address

Postby cobaltjones » Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:04 am

It's not particularly negative, it's simply the truth. The proof is in the pudding. Obviously the devs will have a chance to defend themselves, if they decide to actually post that is.
User avatar
cobaltjones
 
Posts: 2725
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:27 am

Re: Request for a State of the Hearth Address

Postby barracuda546 » Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:05 am

There should be no defending. We just want to know if they are still working on the game or when they will start working on it again.
"If you want to go quickly, go alone. If you want to go far, go together."
User avatar
barracuda546
 
Posts: 941
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 12:58 am

Re: Request for a State of the Hearth Address

Postby Fiction_Stick » Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:10 am

Sarchi wrote:
novaalpha wrote:+1


+1

We're at 6 total. 8-)
User avatar
Fiction_Stick
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 11:31 pm

Re: Request for a State of the Hearth Address

Postby dullah » Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:19 am

+1
User avatar
dullah
 
Posts: 199
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 7:09 am

Re: Request for a State of the Hearth Address

Postby hungrycookpot » Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:29 am

It's not particularly negative, it's simply the truth. The proof is in the pudding. Obviously the devs will have a chance to defend themselves, if they decide to actually post that is.

I dunno, seems to me the devs don't have to "defend" anything. Not sure which mmo you run in your spare time for free, seems like quite a bit of work to me.
hungrycookpot
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:00 am

Re: Request for a State of the Hearth Address

Postby cobaltjones » Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:33 am

I don't think you understand what defend means. He claimed I was being overly negative. If I was being negative towards the devs, then at least they would have a chance to defend themselves from this negativity via addressing the issues in this topic.

This is a stupid fucking derail anyway.
User avatar
cobaltjones
 
Posts: 2725
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:27 am

Re: Request for a State of the Hearth Address

Postby Fiction_Stick » Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:37 am

cobaltjones wrote:I don't think you understand what defend means. He claimed I was being overly negative. If I was being negative towards the devs, then at least they would have a chance to defend themselves from this negativity via addressing the issues in this topic.

This is a stupid fucking derail anyway.

You were being negative towards the devs. Jorb and Loftar obviously have more important things to work on. I agree they should not keep us in the dark like this, but saying they are lazy and don't care is entirely not true.
User avatar
Fiction_Stick
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 11:31 pm

Re: Request for a State of the Hearth Address

Postby loftar » Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:46 am

I'm not sure there's much to add beside what has already been said in other threads. The development on Salem right now means that we've had little time to work on Haven the last months, and that's mostly the way it'll have to be until we've managed to release Salem. Right now at the moment things are a bit extra bad, because Jorb is in the process of moving, one of the consequences of which is that our main development environment for Haven in inaccessible as well.

It's really quite frustrating, because I would like to work a lot more on Haven than I do now; but I don't really see what the alternative is, to be honest. Seeing how we're getting paid to work on Salem, we have to get it done. I really do long for the day when I can focus more on Haven again, though.

Don't get me totally wrong, though; Salem is also an awesome game, I'm enjoying working on it a lot, too, and I can't wait for the day that allows more public testing of it. Testing and release planning and such things are more up to Paradox than to Jorb and me, however, so I can't really comment much on it (if it were only up to me, I'd have you all playing it already, incomplete though it may be). It's worth mentioning, if I haven't done so already, that Paradox decided to replace Jorb's art with art from some professional studio, and that's making the whole development process quite a bit more complex. As a consequence, they don't want us to show any more footage of the game until such time as the graphics have been properly replaced. It seems to be one of those things I have to deal with when dealing with corporations.
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
User avatar
loftar
 
Posts: 9051
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am

Re: Request for a State of the Hearth Address

Postby barracuda546 » Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:49 am

Thank you.
"If you want to go quickly, go alone. If you want to go far, go together."
User avatar
barracuda546
 
Posts: 941
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 12:58 am

Re: Request for a State of the Hearth Address

Postby Fiction_Stick » Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:51 am

loftar wrote: if I haven't done so already, that Paradox decided to replace Jorb's art with art from some professional studio


:evil:
User avatar
Fiction_Stick
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 11:31 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Inn of Brodgar

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 5 guests