Who are you?

[Phizuol]

I like UAC since I favor archery. That's pretty much all of my story.

[Vigilance]

BTW the topic at hand: I stick faithfully to UAC. I've been pantsing people for a while now...

[kLauE]

UA>ALL

lol at mm

lol at mc, cuz it's only for noobs

[joojoo1975]

i was UA in W3. in fact i "thought" i was a contender with my UA being 255. then i found out about thane's and Dhelm(IE got a hold of some)

stopped being UA after that.


the biggest(imho) balancing problem is the fact jewerly and items boost your melee, MONDO. while only things(i believe) boosts your ua is nettle clothes and the cutthroat curraise.



with this in effect, it's gonna be hard as heck being pure anything. before i would get 14 coins with a DoG against a peep(and only if he was non UA). now the guide says: the cap for maximum advantage gain is 2x meaning you will not be granted more than twice the base gain of the maneuver (ex. no more than 2 IP per move for Death or Glory).


and all the screenies i been seeing has peeps with swords or axes.


i mean 2 thanes(q90) and a dhelm(q90) gives you 150+ to melee(educated guess from what i remember of my stuff in W3)

[Hourai_Chimes]

I use d) None of the above

[Skorm]

i was UA in W3. in fact i "thought" i was a contender with my UA being 255. then i found out about thane's and Dhelm(IE got a hold of some)

stopped being UA after that.


the biggest(imho) balancing problem is the fact jewerly and items boost your melee, MONDO. while only things(i believe) boosts your ua is nettle clothes and the cutthroat curraise.



with this in effect, it's gonna be hard as heck being pure anything. before i would get 14 coins with a DoG against a peep(and only if he was non UA). now the guide says: the cap for maximum advantage gain is 2x meaning you will not be granted more than twice the base gain of the maneuver (ex. no more than 2 IP per move for Death or Glory).


and all the screenies i been seeing has peeps with swords or axes.


i mean 2 thanes(q90) and a dhelm(q90) gives you 150+ to melee(educated guess from what i remember of my stuff in W3)

actually, the new jewelry is one of the balance's i was talking about, 150?, no, as far as i know thanes rings have a bse of 10 an the dh has a base of 5 o at q 90 its (30+30+15)=75 bonus, while is not that high is still a considerable buff, compared to the +9 a CC would give at q 90.

[joojoo1975]

well, they are making steps in trying to balance out the two.

but honestly if you came against a peep with the same score as yours, yours being Ua and his melee and he had 2 rings that gave him 20 points. do you think you would beat him?


hence hwy i am saying Melee seems to be better for now.

[Skorm]

well, they are making steps in trying to balance out the two.

but honestly if you came against a peep with the same score as yours, yours being Ua and his melee and he had 2 rings that gave him 20 points. do you think you would beat him?


hence hwy i am saying Melee seems to be better for now.

actually yes, what seems to be the poit on uac vs melee, is yes, melee is quite easy to overcame the guy's uac, BUT the issue is that melee guy will get raped if he does not have some uac, so you are "wasting" some points, while the uac just drains everything into uac, granting that extra skill nedeed.

[bmjclark]

well, they are making steps in trying to balance out the two.

but honestly if you came against a peep with the same score as yours, yours being Ua and his melee and he had 2 rings that gave him 20 points. do you think you would beat him?


hence hwy i am saying Melee seems to be better for now.

I would say UA is much stronger in a 1v1 fight if ur both just standing still beating on each other, +melee from items or not (also assuming 1 person has say, 300 UA and the other has 300 melee, but neither cross skills over if that makes sense). I think personally that a mix of UA and MC is best. I personally go about 3:1 (ua to mc) sometimes a bit more MC then that, the IP cost on MC just makes it weaker in a standard fight.

[Skorm]

well, they are making steps in trying to balance out the two.

but honestly if you came against a peep with the same score as yours, yours being Ua and his melee and he had 2 rings that gave him 20 points. do you think you would beat him?


hence hwy i am saying Melee seems to be better for now.

I would say UA is much stronger in a 1v1 fight if ur both just standing still beating on each other, +melee from items or not (also assuming 1 person has say, 300 UA and the other has 300 melee, but neither cross skills over if that makes sense). I think personally that a mix of UA and MC is best. I personally go about 3:1 (ua to mc) sometimes a bit more MC then that, the IP cost on MC just makes it weaker in a standard fight.

exactly how does this works? fight whit uac and do the killing blows whit mc ?