LadyV wrote:loftar wrote:TeckXKnight wrote:I really wish there was some form of accountability with crowdsourcing though.
I would be quite surprised if it weren't possible to sue a fraudulent project for "bad faith" or whatever the US legal term is, if you can make the case that they never even intended to fulfill their end of the bargain.
There is but most who scam like that end up releasing something even if utterly horrible so they can say we tried. The problem with such laws is they never judge intent in most cases. They judge did they attempt to provide the service the promised. So in most cases just releasing something gets them out of legal prosecution. Law is still trying to catch up to the digital age.
loftar wrote:git da mony
Saxony4 wrote:This is the problem for a lot of early access games that come out on steam, they'll stop developement for months on end for a game and then when people go apeshit they release some stupid patch and never live up to the hype or idea of how the game was going to be upon completion. Even worse that you can't get a refund for a game that has had no active development for months or years even while still being in early access.
Jackard wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZHElERa0JA
CTheRain wrote:Rust is getting better in the newer version,
RustyBuckitt wrote:CTheRain wrote:Rust is getting better in the newer version,
Based on what I heard, the devs give less a fuck about hackers and bugs, and more on making trees look more "realistic."
And because of what I've heard, I'm not touching that shit.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Claude [Bot] and 1 guest