I am afraid it is in german :/
I might give some more insights on it tomorrow, but now I need to sleep.
burgingham wrote:I am afraid it is in german :/
I might give some more insights on it tomorrow, but now I need to sleep.
burgingham wrote:With people being tortured and killed. There is nothing social about that, not even when a single person has to suffer for the others health. The human rights are something universal and not something western specific.
Also most revolutions in the arabic states were driven by the people (the initial drive in Libya too). You conveniently just leave that out of your argument.
Even the Arabs have realized by now that democracy is the way out of physical opression, out of corruption etc. Nobody is arguing here that the western democracies are anywhere near perfect, but they damn well beat any of these authoritarian countries, where people still have to endure physical brutality and the opression of an independent mind.
cauda_draconis wrote:The more i read thread like this - the more i understand, that there is some bottomless abyss between the western and our mentality.
I could hardly understand, how 8-monthes civil war could be considered as "revolutuion against the tyrant"? Who is fighting on his side - zombies, ressurected by necromancy?
I could hardly understand, how could you consider all modern neocolonial wars as "crusade for democracy". Really, it's hard to imagine for me, that no one from you never think about "why we spread democracy only to the countries with large reserves of oil?". Dont you understand, that dictators in the South Africa are million times more cruel, then dictators in the middle east?
Dont you understand, that Lybia was the more social state from the middle east and north africa states, with free healthcare, education and social programs? I'm sure, and i could bet with anyone here, that Lybia hardly gets more democracy, but definitely drop it's standarts of living to shit.
burg wrote:Also most revolutions in the arabic states were driven by the people (the initial drive in Libya too). You conveniently just leave that out of your argument.
cauda_draconis wrote:I would like to take you to any of the ex-ussr countries in the early 90s. You have a wonderful chance to tell old mans and womans, that they should live for 1$ and be grateful for they now can shout "Yeltzin is a homo" on the Red Square. I think you would like that sight - extremely poor country, totally corrupted, with no police and law, with the workers, who could not get salary for several monthes. I'm sure, you would say: "i see, how happy those guys from getting some political rights".
burgingham wrote:So basically the same as now just that they took away their liberty to shout "Yeltzin is a homo" again?
burgingham wrote:Didn't know you are from the Ukraine btw, but Putin will make sure that sooner or later there is no difference again.
Users browsing this forum: BLEX [Bot], Claude [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 2 guests