Fusion UO

General discussion and socializing.

Re: Fusion UO

Postby OMGANDYLOL » Tue Mar 30, 2010 11:25 am

Moracin wrote:
OMGANDYLOL wrote:Also, it doesn't take 2 years to code a UO server. You can have a very decent one done in a month easily.. It just depends what hours you put in / your skills.

Let's be honest, you didn't code it, or you wouldn't need a Core coder, etc, your are just a little script kiddie that downloaded a simple repack from a release website :P

OMGANDYLOL wrote:About my player relation skills.. rofl.

Rofl indeed, you have none

OMGANDYLOL wrote:The only reason im a dick is because 90% of players on here simply flame UO while they play a carebear game such as "gather wood and mine" while not even thinking that almost every other sandbox has this.. UO included.


I like playing gather wood and mine, set up a farm and survive with some friends trying to build up a village in the middle of freaking nowhere. And this game is still in alpha made by 2 students and it is already superiour to most sandbox "gather wood and mine" games.

OMGANDYLOL wrote:H&H runs maybe 100 ave users "maybe"

Get your facts straight.
OMGANDYLOL wrote:While there are more than 50,000 UO players "atleast" Currently playing.

Not on your server

But I have to congratulate on one thing:
Image


LOL OK.. il explain something to you about UO servers. You download RunUO, that gives you a very very basic UO:R server with a empty world. Converting it to Pre:Ren is up to the owner to script himself, thus you re-write every code that you receive. Then creating a custom Pre:Ren server "fusionUO" creates more coding. Then spawning by hand instead of downloading a spawner is even more work, then editing loot mobs and creating new mobs = more coding. The list go's on and on. If you could simply download a already made server, they wouldn't have RunUO forums.. There would be 100x more free servers then there already are. And UO would be dead years ago due to server flooding. Google facts before commenting.
User avatar
OMGANDYLOL
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 10:15 am

Re: Fusion UO

Postby Junkfist » Tue Mar 30, 2010 11:41 am

UO perspective gives me a headache and this poster is shit.
Junkfist
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 5:06 pm

Re: Fusion UO

Postby Onionfighter » Tue Mar 30, 2010 11:56 am

OMGANDYLOL wrote:Google facts before commenting.

Back at you.

But then my post is obviously pointless because you seem to get something out of everyone hating you . . .

My offer still stands about me showing you the true "carebear" nature of this game.
Cheerleader
User avatar
Onionfighter
 
Posts: 2957
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 8:45 am
Location: Mordor

Re: Fusion UO

Postby Thijssnl » Tue Mar 30, 2010 11:56 am

LOL OK.. il explain something to you about UO servers. You download RunUO, that gives you a very very basic UO:R server with a empty world. Converting it to Pre:Ren is up to the owner to script himself, thus you re-write every code that you receive. Then creating a custom Pre:Ren server "fusionUO" creates more coding. Then spawning by hand instead of downloading a spawner is even more work, then editing loot mobs and creating new mobs = more coding. The list go's on and on. If you could simply download a already made server, they wouldn't have RunUO forums.. There would be 100x more free servers then there already are. And UO would be dead years ago due to server flooding. Google facts before commenting.



Still not gone? Bloody hell
User avatar
Thijssnl
 
Posts: 2389
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:09 pm

Re: Fusion UO

Postby Flame » Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:10 pm

man, is quite simple, so stop posting.

I've played uo for years. Is a nice game, ther's a lot of work behind.

I'm playing this game, is a nice game and ther's a lot of work behind.

...why search for a challenge, when both the games are hobby and are what you want to do? Work on your game peacefully and let here devs work on his game like they want.
You'v tryed to spam your server but the topic is fallen in a flame. Now it is useless, so stop it and keep on work on your server, you don't have anymore buysness here.

You can't challenge two differents games and ther's no way that you can comparate UO with HH. Are Different, in server, in gameplay, in graphics, in everything.
Ther's no the "right way to have a server" or stuff like this. A server must work well, you can pay it or you can try to have your own.
Why you cares? They are free.

See ya.
User avatar
Flame
 
Posts: 1834
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 5:03 pm

Re: Fusion UO

Postby Thijssnl » Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:28 pm

Flame wrote:man, is quite simple, so stop posting.

I've played uo for years. Is a nice game, ther's a lot of work behind.

I'm playing this game, is a nice game and ther's a lot of work behind.

...why search for a challenge, when both the games are hobby and are what you want to do? Work on your game peacefully and let here devs work on his game like they want.
You'v tryed to spam your server but the topic is fallen in a flame. Now it is useless, so stop it and keep on work on your server, you don't have anymore buysness here.

You can't challenge two differents games and ther's no way that you can comparate UO with HH. Are Different, in server, in gameplay, in graphics, in everything.
Ther's no the "right way to have a server" or stuff like this. A server must work well, you can pay it or you can try to have your own.
Why you cares? They are free.

See ya.



Flame is the only who doesnt flame, lmao
User avatar
Thijssnl
 
Posts: 2389
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:09 pm

Re: Fusion UO

Postby Potjeh » Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:44 pm

Editing a couple of variables doesn't make you a programmer.
Image Bottleneck
User avatar
Potjeh
 
Posts: 11811
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: Fusion UO

Postby Mopstar » Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:58 pm

Potjeh wrote:
EPSIL0N wrote:Old may not be bad but it is often less impressive when put alongside something new, especially computer and video games.

I've yet to play an RPG that impresses me more than Fallout 2 or a strategy more impressive than Starcraft.


have you played company of heroes .its probably the closest id say to beaten starcraft depending on your tastes. rome total war is good enough too if you like turned bases and rt together. take a look at them. http://www.google.com

but back on topic id rather play this in ASCII than play ultima again.played uo for maybe 6 months and after that id say i hate that game more than i taught possible as i always give games a chance like i had to for df. the game mechanics are smart enough but imo this games mechanics are more fun and the whole sandbox thing beats your simple pvp based game anytime.We still get frequent updates even if we dont like what we are given but just are usually for the better
Wolfang wrote:
+1 I don't know how he did it, but Mopstar did steal his own stuff. You have to be a pretty hardcore thief to be able to steal your own things!
User avatar
Mopstar
 
Posts: 445
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:03 pm

Re: Fusion UO

Postby Potjeh » Tue Mar 30, 2010 4:25 pm

I like Medieval II better than Rome. Neither can hold a candle to Starcraft, though. I haven't actually played CoH, but from what I've seen it's nowhere near Starcraft. The closest thing to it is Age of Kings, but it's not quite there.
Image Bottleneck
User avatar
Potjeh
 
Posts: 11811
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: Fusion UO

Postby Pacho » Tue Mar 30, 2010 5:15 pm

I like how he bashes H&H, yet he can't bring himself to leave. He's addicted I tell you.

Now all he needs is to accept it.
Pacho
 
Posts: 712
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 2:21 am

PreviousNext

Return to The Inn of Brodgar

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 4 guests