burgingham wrote:As I have pointed out before am I in the much better position to do proper critiqueing than you for the above mentioned reasons of you being so caught up in it.
plaguespark wrote:burgingham wrote:As I have pointed out before am I in the much better position to do proper critiqueing than you for the above mentioned reasons of you being so caught up in it.
Your butthurt experience matters not
btaylor wrote:I have learned that the game doesn't follow the principles of mathematics. If you want something and the game is in a good mood you can get it, whatever it is. More often than not, however, the game wants you to die.
ewlol wrote:I don't know why you are fooling yourself into thinking that people who no longer play should be disregarded in their thoughts and observations. I have every right to give my opinion. This strange idea that you have planted in your heads that people who no longer play are worth nothing is completely wrong. Should sports observers who have retired be fired from ESPN? Should Bill Clinton be unable to comment on any matters regarding the presidency? Am I unable to give my opinion, or even observe for that matter, on matters of the game currently?
WarpedWiseMan wrote: "the game is not broken and if you don't play this version you should shut up".
bmjclark wrote:..... anyone who still enjoys playing it,even in its broken state.......
bmjclark wrote:.......it is pretty much the only possible way to siege a town right now because there really is no siege mechanic in place as you well know.....
Cajoes wrote:I was the murder victim your guy aggro'd. And slew. Entirely unprovoked. Rather handily at that. Which prompted the retaliatory party. That you also handily slew.
btaylor wrote:I have learned that the game doesn't follow the principles of mathematics. If you want something and the game is in a good mood you can get it, whatever it is. More often than not, however, the game wants you to die.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 1 guest