_Gunnar wrote:Do you have a counterargument to my post, btw? I'm guessing no.
To reiterate, I'm fine with you believing in god. But dull minded, angry little theists like you make me really sad when they spout rubbish about Darwin like they know what they are talking about*.
There is no need for you to argue with science to justify your belief in the existence of the supernatural. It should be a matter of "faith alone", you don't need to (attempt to) prove it a scientific or mathematical sense. The only evidence that should matter is your personal experience, imo, and I would never try to intrude on that. You shouldn't intrude on matters of science that have nothing to do with religion, and then we can all get along well enough...
*a lot of the "narrow minded angry little atheists" probably don't know what they are talking about either, and yes I like to disagree with everyone.
Did you not read any of my previous posts on the subject? I'm guessing no, and that reading comprehension is not your cup of tea.
Allow me to reiterate:
1) Science and evolution exist. So why shouldn't I use the manner in which the world is observed to explain my own personal belief system?
2) Never tried to prove anything. Even if I did believe in the Christian model I wouldn't want
any of you fucktards mucking about in heaven with me. All I did was give some reasons why I believe life is too complicated for science to be the end all be all in regards to the creation of human existence.
3) That specific response was aimed at dagriblarghasomething because he's been a fucking twat the entire thread.
4) Believe what you want, but I already stated almost everything you wrote in this pointless post earlier in the thread.
ninja_yodeler wrote:Good post General Gunnar
WarpedWiseMan wrote:
Just because you can't unprove something doesn't make you any less of a wanker. It's narrow minded, angry little atheists like you that make me laugh whenever I read about the end of Charles Darwin's life.
Have you ever taken notice of the fact your being any angry narrow minded little (opposite of atheist-no idea what the correct word is)
I'm fine with everyone believing what they will, we are all to arrogant to publicly change our views, but for the love of god (or lack thereof) don't sit their with your only counter argument being "your all so narrow minded idiots" while your failing to realize you are doing the exact same thing, only instead of saying "no," you are saying "yes."
Yawn. Have you ever noticed that the inside of your cranium smells like dead hamster?
Nask wrote:ninja_yodeler wrote:Good post General Gunnar
WarpedWiseMan wrote:
Just because you can't unprove something doesn't make you any less of a wanker. It's narrow minded, angry little atheists like you that make me laugh whenever I read about the end of Charles Darwin's life.
Have you ever taken notice of the fact your being any angry narrow minded little (opposite of atheist-no idea what the correct word is)
I'm fine with everyone believing what they will, we are all to arrogant to publicly change our views, but for the love of god (or lack thereof) don't sit their with your only counter argument being "your all so narrow minded idiots" while your failing to realize you are doing the exact same thing, only instead of saying "no," you are saying "yes."

+1
Smilies are a sure-fire sign of deteriorating brain function.