GrapefruitV wrote:there is no reason to assume everything penis-like was inspired by penis.
That's the thing, it doesn't need to be 'inspired' or 'designed'. It occurs that way naturally. If you don't believe me, go eat a mushroom.
GrapefruitV wrote:there is no reason to assume everything penis-like was inspired by penis.
Chakravanti wrote:GrapefruitV wrote:there is no reason to assume everything penis-like was inspired by penis.
That's the thing, it doesn't need to be 'inspired' or 'designed'. It occurs that way naturally. If you don't believe me, go eat a mushroom.
Chakravanti wrote:That's the thing, it doesn't need to be 'inspired' or 'designed'. It occurs that way naturally. If you don't believe me, go eat a mushroom.
overtyped wrote:Eating mushrooms are against the bible i'm pretty sure, so don't do that.
Potjeh wrote:You should go talk about male privilege to all those divorced men who got totally shafted by the legal system.
cecelia wrote:Potjeh wrote:You should go talk about male privilege to all those divorced men who got totally shafted by the legal system.
alimony (i think that is what you were referring to) is not based on gender
Vespasian wrote:You might surprised...The bible says some crazy stuff. Religious people don't know it. Just make stuff up and say it's from there. Most of the time they won't check.
Vespasian wrote:You might surprised...The bible says some crazy stuff. Religious people don't know it. Just make stuff up and say it's from there. Most of the time they won't check.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 3 guests