Eemerald wrote:xcom makes a point of reporting all exploits to jorb. normally theyre ignored. but at least he reports them. and he does normally dot hreads to share those little details etc. aalso the crashing of the server happened through taming, not some ground breaking thing which was being done which is why he thought it was strange. again, he admitted it when he saw a pattern. but the server definitely should not be crashing by that.
friendliness to people who play the game is just general courtesy to people. be they 'abusers# or morally amazing.
also I never suggested everything done was of benefit to others, I have stated before it what makes the game fun for them. I merely stated a couple of projects which were for the benefit of others.
please have a nice rest and reply back with a clear cool head.
reminds me of the days how koya and russian players used to claim they had reported many bugs and gotten ignored by devs.
i do get to talk to loftar quite often, often enough to bother him with time-wasting trash and tibdits and its not just myself alone but some others who join in the convo which is mostly done in public. if you think they are ignored, ever considered why? why do they have to choose when devs are most likely asleep/afk/too busy, or when we all know that they are super-busy with coming salem udpates. doesnt it ever hit you that maybe deciding "ignored" without considering timing is rather selfish? they are not your servants, they cant come right up at your requests, yet they just chose to go ahead with "the experiments" only at their convenience and complain "we get ingored"?
as for crashing the server, romovs explained a bit about his "taming" and it wasnt just a normal taming. his "speeding it up" process caused the server unstability and crashing obviously, and he and xcom had to tame new sheep over and over for this abuse project. and you should be well aware that many players have been taming sheep in ways that did not cause the server crash.
even though they were probably not trying to crash it on purpose, apparently they were abusing the taming mechanics. (loftar confirmed it was not solely by taming later in public.) oh, and you are definitely not in the place to decide what should cause the crash or what shouldnt.
Eemerald wrote:well last world is was about how I could say I am peaceful and have friends in towns which raid. which was kicked off by joojoo's consideration to join the town, which you have dug at a few times even after a very long discussion through pm. and I don't think I was rude or disrespectful to you there in sharing views on that. and since a few things on EC and this whole botting thing. the whole you are more of a moral and real player and we are not because we don't play as u do.
you felt like i attacked you many times? but ive attacked you for those two things only, which are basically one same attack against "we dont do this/that" crap when your friends do it for you that you approve of -that disgusts me more than the actual doers. i remember your noob days whining posts and i was actually impressed at your later work after you stopped whining and i even mentioned my respect to your "then-new" village when i was asked in #haven a few times. i previously only had respects to you
before those comments of yours were uttered. that is why i chose to pm you for the further discussion, but it was like ... i was tryin to play a catch while you were playing a dodge and i gave up there.
if you want to take it personal, its your call and id enjoy your grudge. btw, i didnt start this one here, rather avoided at first, i just couldnt resist myself to reply back to that chocolate person mentioning him/her and you are in the same boat and you had to chime in to reboil it.
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=34773&p=462378#p462378jorb wrote:jordancoles wrote:The default client should have farming/hunger grinding bots by this point because it's so important and needed by everyone.
... or we could spend that time making better farming and hunger mechanics instead.
this really sums up how devs see this botting trend. if they approve of botting as a playstyle, why wouldnt jorb have agreed to joco?
ramones wrote:Tonky, can you explain who are "they" and which projects are retarded, and which projects do you even know "they" did? U're just jelly cause people still find fun in this game, however they can.
Project numen zero had absolutelly 0 influence on the server population, no one knew anything until it was released and the exploit fixed. Just stop whining, please
![Trollface ¦]](./images/smilies/troll.gif)
ramones, if you can accuse me of being jealous, i can accuse you of continueing rmt and all the abuses and exploits more than your projects revealed without any proof too, you know

me being jealous is the last straw youve got there?
"they" as in those xcom wrote in his own thread, so i dont have to "teach" you who and who, do i?
all projects that can be only achieved with botting is ridiculous.
you remember how many ppl cried when the server crashed? you cant call that "0" influence.
no one knew till released? ha ha, you wish.
you can stop whining about getting nothing but numens nuked. do you seriously believe devs would actually trust players blindly now?