...
Didn't know "asking jorb" was possible D:
Damn, wish I had asked jorb.
Jalpha wrote:I believe in my interpretation of things.
fanit937 wrote:Flame wrote:Ahhw...
I hate Nerd :/
They force me to forget about my social life.
anyway, if you up Peacefull, it up change too. (not reversed)
Plus the server don't calculate correctly the h.
Ye I know, and that's probably the game time, not reallife time. But still, I got only 3 chances to change my beliefs.
Jalpha wrote:I believe in my interpretation of things.
nawatedisu wrote:I have a sneaky feeling that Jorb will hate Arvin for letting people know about that, because Jorb will get millions of PMs.
krikke93 wrote:nawatedisu wrote:I have a sneaky feeling that Jorb will hate Arvin for letting people know about that, because Jorb will get millions of PMs.
He made a post himself...
Jalpha wrote:I believe in my interpretation of things.
NOOBY93 wrote:...
Didn't know "asking jorb" was possible D:
Damn, wish I had asked jorb.
jorb wrote:what edifices of behaviors or morality you believe progressives tore down and deconstructed
I find the public expressions of modernity to be shallow, vain, stale, technocratic, petty, animalistic, lonely, ugly, egotistic, spiritually lacking and devoid of meaning, and feel instead far more comfortable in what I perceive to be the vertically oriented, familial, richer, fuller, and more integrated world view and symbolism of what can broadly be described as the old order, that is to say traditional, Christian and Monarchical European societies as they appeared -- rooted in the soil of their making -- before the murderous ravages of the 20th century. When I lament Jacobin deconstruction, it is precisely the deconstruction of traditional, legitimate authority and natural order I lament, i.e. the systematic subversion of symbols such as those of -- most visibly -- throne and altar, and their replacement instead with the symbols of money and the guillotine, that is to say corporate neo-mercantilism and democracy.
I do not believe in democracy, nor in human equality before any yardstick other than God. The forms, concepts, expressions and internal contradictions of liberal secular religion and theology are not mine, and I take no interest in them. I consider beauty to be an objective category, and a human value of no lesser an importance than that of truth or justice.
I believe that God in his image made men and women separate and distinct. I recognize the fundamental distinctness of archetypes such as 'Mother' and 'Father', and I do not believe that human life or understanding is served by reducing such wondrous categories of structured reality to an undifferentiated muddle of indistinct chaos, i.e. "equality". It follows that I feel no particular compulsion to treat men and women "equally", but on the contrary always with respect for the fullness and integrity of their persons.
I consider any assertion of equality as a value to be incompatible with the recognition of human personhood and personality; the fundamental, manifold expressions of harmonious -- that is to say differentiated and fundamentally unequal -- reality, and the most beautiful qualities of the human condition.
I believe it virtuous to put kith and kin before strangers.
I do not consider fornication to be the apex of human personal achievement.
This makes perfect sense to me: [spoiler][/spoiler]
This does not: [spoiler][/spoiler]
I am of course well aware that the Fall from Grace is of a far older date than the 20th century, and I entertain no Utopian illusions about any actualized earthly perfection at any time since.
I believe in love, humility, grace, mercy, humor and forgiveness, and in meeting my fellow men in the most Christian spirit I can possibly muster.
The Lord knows I struggle at times.
-----------------------------
It is precisely this the very understanding of virtue that has been deconstructed and torn down.
All flesh is hay.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 3 guests