Sevenless wrote:It's cheating if the devs call it cheating though, and while they don't suggest people bot I'm not certain they've ever said people shouldn't bot.
No, that's not how it works. It's cheating, whether the devs accept the cheats or not is irrelevant. For example, you can cheat in Age of Empires, in a multiplayer match. The devs themselves put them in the game, and they allow the players to decide if they want to cheat or not. But that doesn't change the fact that they ARE using cheats.
Sevenless wrote:But honestly, I enjoy the game more with bots for some things. A lot more.
Hauling wood is tolerable at first, but it gets a bit old after the first 2-3 thousand logs. And in general it's hard to find players young enough to hire to do that work. Not to mention hiring people in this game is a large security risk. Point being in some instances it actually improves the game, especially for overly grindy activities that bear no reward or alternative to mass clicking 10 pixels apart for hours on end.
Again, just because you CAN use bots doesn't mean you should. You don't like how the game works? Stop playing. You like the game, but dislike certain parts of it? Wait until the developers change that parts (hah!), or accept them. Just because using bots is allowed doesn't mean it's morally acceptable (and yes, whether it's ethical or not is the only thing we can discuss here, because until using bots or scripts is a bannable offense, people will keep doing it).
Also: Anyone can bot now that there's public bot clients available.
I reiterate my point.