by Eemerald » Fri Feb 07, 2014 3:44 pm it was directed at chocolaterain. you probably didnt like me calling you a kettle, but that was nothing new after our previous argument and i didnt consider it as a new attack. besides, i thought you said you had already accepted whatever i found you as.
well whichever part was meant for me or not, you cant expect to openly pull people up on things you see as wrong and not expect they will respond to you in turn in the manner you started the discussion.
oh? thought we had similar views to that part. whatever you find fun with and you accomplish it then it is your win, isnt it?
there is a reason to put quotation marks.
and I dodge questions...hmmm. well im so glad that winning is differently for everyone and that's agreed on.
there you go again... thought we were talking about the pm discussion we had.
this thread isn't about that, I was only using that old discussion as a reference to previous things we've discussed that u didn't like. for someone who states that all I respond with is to show how great I am, you are the one continually stating how your game play is morally better than everyone elses. the moral high horse can also be considered in the same way.
p.s.
if you think im only flaming you for the sake of flaming, youd better stop wasting your valuable time.
also, i was wondering what made you think im attacking you personally and someone pointed me that i actually helped you a lil bit when you started your trade hub, nothing big, but by talking to the original owner of your candidate spot and getting their permission as you wanted and let you know about it. but you probably found that aggressive too lol
I am aware and do remember that and im pretty sure I thanked you for that, and no I didn't see that as aggressive, there was nothing aggressive about it. the whole point of that thread was to seek locations and share ones found to be agreed upon.
and I wasn't directly talking about u attacking me personally, though u did plenty in this thread, (and I did the same mostly out of annoyance at the fact that everything i stated was pretty clear yet it twisted- eitherway it wasn't the right way to go about it so my apologies ) but more in relation to mytown, how we play and village politics. when my town is under scrutiny I will respond as best as I can and when comments I make are attacked or debated I will again respond to that. that seems to be the normal behaviour of forums. I'm sure other lawspeakers would do the same if their town was mentioned someplace on the forums.
#swag
.
