jorb wrote:A no-alt policy would be unenforceable.
It would, however be quite rad.

too bad
jorb wrote:A no-alt policy would be unenforceable.
Sotsa wrote:jorb wrote:A no-alt policy would be unenforceable.
It would, however be quite rad.
too bad
jorb wrote:Sotsa wrote:jorb wrote:A no-alt policy would be unenforceable.
It would, however be quite rad.
too bad
It would suck even if we could enforce it. Why should people be allowed to play only one character? Really?
aso11 wrote:NaoWhut wrote:Our grasslands will block out the sun.
Wait... grassland doesn't fly. Dude, you've been playing too much Minecraft.
Chill out Chak, out of weed again? It's possible to discuss what effect a one character per person limit would have on the game without endorsing such a limit.Chakravanti wrote:It never ceases to amaze me how people continually persist in suggesting that police state behaviors are a good thing. Fucking brainwashed fascists. At the pinnacle of evolution there are always those who live in fear and promote stagnation with superstitious stories of bygone and discarded eras.
Jotun wrote:Actually, 1 char per account is actually a good idea. It would keep the people who disrupt the trade fluency by being independent at bay, at least to some point. Until they find out you can make multiple accounts, haha
DatOneGuy wrote:wala
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot], Google [Bot] and 1 guest