Stance on gay rights?

General discussion and socializing.

Re: Stance on gay rights?

Postby Neon14 » Fri May 18, 2012 2:40 am

TeckXKnight wrote:
Neon14 wrote:
painhertz wrote:"gay's didn't exist" Gays have always existed..... Are you daft? Even the animal kingdom had homosexuality... Are "animals" making a choice?


Think about it, how many gay people were there in the 1700's? Lol.

Roughly 5% of the population. 300 years is not a significant enough period of time to sway a statistical average like that.


5% compared to 25% today, ~derp

They weren't noticed when The Constitution was written, that's for sure.

If blacks weren't noticed, I doubt that the even smaller population of gays was either.
Last edited by Neon14 on Fri May 18, 2012 4:36 am, edited 2 times in total.
BigStronk
User avatar
Neon14
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 6:49 am

Re: Stance on gay rights?

Postby dagrimreefah » Fri May 18, 2012 2:42 am

sabinati wrote:there are no gay rights
User avatar
dagrimreefah
 
Posts: 2635
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 3:01 am

Re: Stance on gay rights?

Postby Neon14 » Fri May 18, 2012 2:44 am

dagrimreefah wrote:
sabinati wrote:there are no gay rights


This, because there aren't any right at all in America, we're fucking lapdogs.

This country is going nowhere.
BigStronk
User avatar
Neon14
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 6:49 am

Re: Stance on gay rights?

Postby TeckXKnight » Fri May 18, 2012 2:47 am

Neon14 wrote:5% compared to 25% today, 25% is about 1 person in 5 people being gay.

They weren't noticed when The Constitution was written, that's for sure.

This needs to be recorded forever for everyone to bear witness to. Your math is just as uncanny as your logic.
I'm not sure what world you live in where homosexuals have only started to exist but I'm pretty sure that they existed fairly openly in the past. Some famous examples would be Lord Byron, even though he was also a notorious womanizer, and Hans Christian Anderson, even though the dude rejected him.

Also, there are no gay rights because they are just human rights. Turning them into gay rights is trying to make them separate but equal.
User avatar
TeckXKnight
 
Posts: 8274
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:31 am
Location: How Do I?

Re: Stance on gay rights?

Postby Neon14 » Fri May 18, 2012 2:55 am

TeckXKnight wrote:
Neon14 wrote:5% compared to 25% today, 25% is about 1 person in 5 people being gay.

They weren't noticed when The Constitution was written, that's for sure.

This needs to be recorded forever for everyone to bear witness to. Your math is just as uncanny as your logic.
I'm not sure what world you live in where homosexuals have only started to exist but I'm pretty sure that they existed fairly openly in the past. Some famous examples would be Lord Byron, even though he was also a notorious womanizer, and Hans Christian Anderson, even though the dude rejected him.

Also, there are no gay rights because they are just human rights. Turning them into gay rights is trying to make them separate but equal.


My math isn't the problem, the only problem I find is my ability to trust google. http://www.gallup.com/poll/147824/adult ... sbian.aspx

Way to go, you named 2 gay people. Are you trying to say that one of the conventions problems was gay discussion? Hardly, I doubt they even sat down and talked about it.

Equality is impossible, we can only try, no ones truly equal, ha.

Plus, I was saying, America has no right at all, we're controlled beyond belief.
BigStronk
User avatar
Neon14
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 6:49 am

Re: Stance on gay rights?

Postby MightySheep » Fri May 18, 2012 3:18 am

I have a brain so I know that being gay is just natural, normal and usually can't be helped

the notion of gays being inferior probably belongs in the past, along with things like religion and racism- no place for them in modern times, they're just not logical

but mainly, my stance is one of not caring
User avatar
MightySheep
 
Posts: 2153
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 1:18 pm

Re: Stance on gay rights?

Postby UberGamerLeeway » Fri May 18, 2012 3:19 am

Neon14 wrote:"I'd be completely fine with walking up to one of the two, and saying I don't like you."
Yea right either one of them would knock you on your ass for being so rude and prejudging them.

Neon14 wrote:"...and the way they SHOW they're black."
Please tell me your fucking retarded, please do.
Hermits with benefits.
User avatar
UberGamerLeeway
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:58 am

Re: Stance on gay rights?

Postby Neon14 » Fri May 18, 2012 3:31 am

UberGamerLeeway wrote:
Neon14 wrote:"I'd be completely fine with walking up to one of the two, and saying I don't like you."
Yea right either one of them would knock you on your ass for being so rude and prejudging them.

Neon14 wrote:"...and the way they SHOW they're black."
Please tell me your fucking retarded, please do.


UberGamerLeeway wrote:" Yea right either one of them would knock you on your ass for being so rude and prejudging them."


Neon14 wrote:"...and the way they SHOW they're black."


Lol, try getting jumped a few times in Los Angeles, you'll understand then ^

It's pretty easy to say they'll knock your ass down, and call me a retard, but what i'm trying to say with all the respect I can is, first impressions are everything, and a lot of groups aren't leaving good impressions on others, so others don't feel good about that group!
BigStronk
User avatar
Neon14
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 6:49 am

Re: Stance on gay rights?

Postby TeckXKnight » Fri May 18, 2012 3:37 am

As a heads up, I have no interest in stifling discussion or shutting down meaningful argument. All that I ask is that people keep level heads. If at any point things get out of hand you will politely be asked to calm down for a bit.
User avatar
TeckXKnight
 
Posts: 8274
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:31 am
Location: How Do I?

Re: Stance on gay rights?

Postby UberGamerLeeway » Fri May 18, 2012 3:42 am

Neon14 wrote:Lol, try getting jumped a few times in Los Angeles, you'll understand then

Because every mugger/gang member are black, right.

Neon14 wrote:"...and a lot of groups aren't leaving good impressions on others, so others don't feel good about that group!

And you show that you a complete racist, you make these "groups" up in your head. An action of few idiots does not condemn an entire race to your own idiotic remarks.

Also the reason I wanted you to tell me your retarded is so I would know there was a reason behind your blatantly stupid statements but it turns out you're just an ignorant scumbag.

Teck I won't be commenting in this thread again so ya don't need to calm me down :D
Last edited by UberGamerLeeway on Fri May 18, 2012 3:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Hermits with benefits.
User avatar
UberGamerLeeway
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:58 am

PreviousNext

Return to The Inn of Brodgar

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 4 guests