jordancoles wrote:No, I get that. But why pick the 71st day? Instead of say, the 100th to give it more significance. Or did you just decide to post for the answer regardless of the count?
I saw it as more drawing contrast to how long it's been since any activity from normal (surely over 2 months of inactivity is strong enough on it's own based on how the game usually flows). No need to pick an arbitrary number, I figure Valten's post was less based on planning and more based on wanting an answer. Could've waited until 100 days, but that's another month away, and time left letting this question float in his head is something he would prefer against, and it outweighs waiting for some arbitrary figure like 100.