overtyped wrote:Rhiannon wrote:"Justice" is the equal or balanced compensation for a loss. You can get "justice" for someone stealing and crashing your car. A few years in prison for the violation of your property and compensation for your financial loss. You cannot place a dollar amount or anything else on a human life. And nothing you get will replace, bring back or equally compensate you for your loss. The death penalty is vengeance... So, while it is true that I do not consider the death penalty "Justice" but instead is "Vengeance". I believe Vengeance has value and can heal and can be "just".
So I want them dead, dead, dead...not because it will compensate (Justice) for that child's life...but because it serves a soothing, healing and just purpose....the satisfaction of vengeance when deserved AND desired by those who can be healed by it.
Those who do not NEED vengeance will not ask for it, nor seek it, nor get anything from it. Those who do, will. And if you have a problem with these 2 animals being used to satisfy that need, or denigrate those whom will find the satisfaction healing or of value...well, that's why we are humans and not penguins. I do not value your LACK of that need anymore or less than those who do have that need. And since these animals forfeit their lives by their actions, at least their death in the service of vengeance serves some purpose to someone besides sapping 50 grand a year to house the beasts.
Let me tell you what a fool you are. Let's say for arguments sake that there was a lesser crime done. Let's say you accidentally crash your car and kill someone, and the family of the deceased are equally as upset as the people who have been killed in this murder case. Would you think it just if you are murdered to make the people involved "feel" a little better? Life is already cruel, nothing of value is gained by killing two people that will never leave prison again.
Also I already said this but you didn't appear to have read anything I wrote so I will say it again. Executing a prisoner is more expensive than keeping them alive.
Rhiannon wrote:I stopped at the 1st sentence, to 1st say, let me tell you what a low life scumbag little dicked low-iq loser you are...(Does that make you want to read the rest of my point?). Now I will read the rest of yours and see if any of it is worthy of any further comment.....reading...reading....wandered to my son's monitor as he plays Happy Wheels....back to reading....sees idiotic rant about lesser crimes and some one who had an "Accident" being the target of some victim's demand for the death penalty, in comparison to premeditated torture and murder...rolls eyes at the ridiculous LACK of a point in such an analogy....nope...nothing else to say....thank you for your comment.
Sectory wrote:Rhiannon wrote:I stopped at the 1st sentence, to 1st say, let me tell you what a low life scumbag little dicked low-iq loser you are...(Does that make you want to read the rest of my point?). Now I will read the rest of yours and see if any of it is worthy of any further comment.....reading...reading....wandered to my son's monitor as he plays Happy Wheels....back to reading....sees idiotic rant about lesser crimes and some one who had an "Accident" being the target of some victim's demand for the death penalty, in comparison to premeditated torture and murder...rolls eyes at the ridiculous LACK of a point in such an analogy....nope...nothing else to say....thank you for your comment.
People with anger issues like this should have had certain reliability tests before being allowed to have kids. Financial reliability to prevent the amount of orphans, mental reliability to make sure you're able to function well enough to handle a kid. Kids aren't just fun and games. They're hard work. All of this could probably have been prevented since the parents were probably known for having issues. I wouldn't blame the parents too much on this matter, it's the lack of good governance.
As for Rhiannon, I'm not here to argue with you. If you're not even capable of taking someone's opinion in consideration, why would I even try. But please, think before you take your anger out on your kid.
overtyped wrote:Executing a prisoner is more expensive than keeping them alive.
Rhiannon wrote:gives anger advice and actually associates a post with real life behavior
Tonkyhonk wrote:it depends. i can imagine lethal injection can be quite pricey. no matter how pretty it looks for those invited for the show, execution is inhumane enough for the executioners too.
TeckXKnight wrote:We're housing death row inmates for 30, 40 years, sometimes longer at an average cost of $90k a year. Meanwhile keeping a regular inmate is closer to $45k a year, about half the price.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Claude [Bot] and 3 guests