Cpowa wrote:Raephire wrote:Might be a good plan not to threaten or attack people in the future, I may not be likely to deal a finishing blow anymore, but others will.
Complaint ignored.Ferinex wrote:He was referring to the people fishing naked, Cpowa.
Now that I know the real story, it makes my fish post funnier
why you don't ask the witnesses ?
(If Rift does not put them the pressure)
Ferinex wrote:Because 'witnesses' cannot see private chats.
Raephire wrote:Cpowa wrote:Raephire wrote:Might be a good plan not to threaten or attack people in the future, I may not be likely to deal a finishing blow anymore, but others will.
Complaint ignored.Ferinex wrote:He was referring to the people fishing naked, Cpowa.
Now that I know the real story, it makes my fish post funnier
why you don't ask the witnesses ?
(If Rift does not put them the pressure)
Are the witnesses credible?
Malicus wrote:Rift's version certainly holds more water than Cpowa's. I cannot calculate a percentage due to divide by zero errors.
But honestly, that's the best you can do? You can't even make up an excuse for why you "accidentally" attacked him, like a boar you wanted to kill being next to him? Weaksauce.
Cpowa wrote:why you don't ask the witnesses ?
(If Rift does not put them the pressure)
Malicus wrote:Merely clicking on somebody does not attack them unless you already have an attack readied.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot], Dotbot [Bot] and 3 guests