Potjeh wrote:there's no shortcut for next page
i thought it was N
Potjeh wrote:there's no shortcut for next page
swebonny wrote:I love this guy. Thinks he's so damn awesome, smart and all shit. He feels so damn good of himself. Luckily I have never met such a person in real life. I can only imagine how it would be to live with such a person.
He brags so much that it seems that he have made the game, while everything he's done is to run a server with some custom tweaks.
It's incredible that there are people like him, although there is a big possibility that he's just trolling.
OMGANDYLOL wrote:Lothaudus wrote:Paying someone else to do it for you is not "taking care of" your server.
Actually, it is. It shows you know the game will succeed, and it keeps players happy.
OMGANDYLOL wrote:I know H&H may require little to nothing to play it even with 1000 ping because it requires no quick movement, but any other game does need hosting. So again, you're wrong.
OMGANDYLOL wrote:Lothaudus wrote:Whether or not UO started online sandbox games, doesn't have any bearing on which one is better.
Maybe, but again.. UO still has thousands if not millions of users still playing / joining. H&H has maybe 100-200 people online MAYBE, and they're on the forums more than ingame it seems. So it kinda does mean UO is better.
OMGANDYLOL wrote:Lothaudus wrote:Like-wise saying H&H is shit is false because otherwise, no-one would be playing it, would they?
Again, there are more people that play Pacman, Hello kitty, Barbie games, Tetres, Even the most shitest games around have more users.
OMGANDYLOL wrote:This is developed by 2 college kids as a school project based as a web browser.
OMGANDYLOL wrote:How can anyone "besides you few hundred people who probably go to the same school lol" take this game seriously?
OMGANDYLOL wrote:Also claiming it to be "its only in alpha" makes no sense after it was for a school project/comp.
OMGANDYLOL wrote:Not a "hey, lets make a game". If it sucked in the competition, they wouldn't be working on it right now. Games that are serious continue to develop even if they originally suck. You really think these kids are going to continue this game 12 months down the track? i don't.
OMGANDYLOL wrote:LothaudusL wrote:Trying to argue graphics when both games have graphics that would run on anything built prior to 1996, is asinine.
No, because it clearly shows what graphics are better between UO and This game.
OMGANDYLOL wrote:Again, only fanboys would claim this to be the other way around.. Look at your character, Look at your paperdoll.. Look how the world is developed. Again, people who think this is the best game ever only think this is true.. but if they were forced to play this game over anything currently out there, they seriously have no clue about games. Thus, the "omg i died in a game, wtf rage" threads.
OMGANDYLOL wrote:Again, if you're creating a decent server, 90% of the scripts are created by the Dev team, not from a download.
OMGANDYLOL wrote:So unless you have done it before "doubt it" you wouldn't have a clue so give up.. those comments are soo fucking stupid.. It's like saying you're a football coach but you follow dancing.
OMGANDYLOL wrote:More oomph than my server? really? i just recently bought a $3400 computer. Im not using it because other than Ram and CPU, a badass computer doesn't really mean shit.
loftar wrote:Furthermore, it's not like we are particularly inclined to run the server from our homes; we just don't have any good alternative. The hosting company you yourself claim to use, xlhost.com, offers only one solution with more bandwidth than we currently have, and it costs $299 per month for only 5 TB/month. That's quite a bit of money, and even then we only get ever so slightly more bandwidth than we currently have -- 5 TB / (30 * 24 * 3600 seconds) is only about 1.9 MB/s, or less than 16 Mb/s, which is just 60% more than Jorb's connection. For reference, the game server needs about 2-3 kB/s per connected user (on average).
OMGANDYLOL wrote:# 1GB DDR2 RAM
# 80GB SATA 3 Gb/s Hard Drive
# 1000GB Transfer
# 100Mbps connection
OMGANDYLOL wrote:The point is, their internet hosting is slow and pathetic, thats my point.
OMGANDYLOL wrote:We're running a 100mb/s connection from the US with 99.9% uptime, Automatic backups with auto restarts while being watched by the hosts IRL.
Again, you lost.
Lothaudus wrote:That was after 30 minutes.. we made a better demo website in 30 minutes compared to this one. Just wait until we unlease our finished project with animations etc...
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 4 guests