windmaker wrote:Metruption wrote:loftar wrote:
- 7 TB RAID1 storage
- Fuck optical drives ^^
How big is your gay porn collection
fix'd
pls loftar, no ban
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9C9OKMyZng
windmaker wrote:Metruption wrote:loftar wrote:
- 7 TB RAID1 storage
- Fuck optical drives ^^
How big is your gay porn collection
fix'd
pls loftar, no ban
loftar wrote:[*]GeForce 560, dual 4:3 monitors
[*]GeForce 630 (rev. 2), retarded 16:9 monitor (y'all who use this willingly should kill yourselves)[/list]
painhertz wrote:>amd fx cpu
painhertz wrote:Sure Core's are better but my entire rig is so insanely powerful that the chances of even 50% of the resources being used by any game
painhertz wrote:Also: As someone pointed out, check that temp. show me a Core pulling that off.....
RustyBuckitt wrote:Is there Anyone, on this entire forum, that has a DDR4 rig?
loftar wrote:painhertz wrote:Sure Core's are better but my entire rig is so insanely powerful that the chances of even 50% of the resources being used by any game
I mostly just wanted to know why rather than make fun of you, but now you're just begging for it. Bulldozer was pretty much AMD's equivalent of Intel's Netburst; 2-wide int issue, shared decoders and L1I, long pipelines, no store-forwarding, no speculative loading, sub-par branch prediction and poor turbo-clocking. Sure, if you find some programs that makes truly judicious use of all 8 cores (ie. not a game) it might not be ridiculously far behind the Cores, but in single-threaded performance even Celerons are beating it. And that's not even mentioning the shared FP logic. The K10 was a better microarchitecture. I used to be an AMD fanboy only 7 years ago and it really pains me to see them put out these hapless processors, but I can't stay blind forever. When we switched the Haven server from AMD to Intel it was like a 3-times speedup at the same clockspeed.
Fortunately, AMD's latest CEO changeup seems somewhat optimistic and they seem to have gotten some of their better engineers back, and I'm holding some hope for the K12.painhertz wrote:Also: As someone pointed out, check that temp. show me a Core pulling that off.....
>FX-8120 TDP: 125W
>Core i7 4790K: 88W
CPU temperature measurements are known to be flaky sometimes; I know what I'm placing my bet on. For the record, one of my previous AMD CPUs used to record negative temperatures.
loftar wrote:RustyBuckitt wrote:Is there Anyone, on this entire forum, that has a DDR4 rig?
Jorb does.
Metruption wrote:overtyped wrote:I just bought the latest apple model, as usual they are ahead of the curve, and their computers aren't inferior to pc in any noticable way.
However, it doesn't appear to be working like my old pc. Does anyone know a good carpenter?
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=29715
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 0 guests