A small request...

[LiberalLies]

Maybe I should ignore you too . No, I know. You simply can't deny its awesomeness, though! . Hopefully, I'll never need to see another idiot post again.

When you ignore them and brag about it, you look like a three year old plugging his ears and going "lalala I cant hear you".

That's you. You are a child.

[poltifar]

Can we get back on subject before half the forum ends up ignoring the other half?

I'd like to know, with the new creature diversity, will there be creatures as strong as bears? Maybe some STRONGER than bears? Also, will you include mythical creatures, or just stay with RL ones?

[Krantarin]

I hope other players will take advantage of the ignore function as well. It allows us to continue discussions without regard for the goons.

Anyway, as I was saying, I don't mind thieves as long as they take no more than an inventories full. When they clear out an entire settlement and then moan about how the ranging system will make it too easy for them to get caught, it's clear to the rest of us that they're simply lazy-alt-abusers. It's possible for a thief to leave only a few clues and still come off with some nice stuff. I hope that the new additions to thievery will help this kind of thief, the smart kind of thief.

I'd like to know, with the new creature diversity, will there be creatures as strong as bears? Maybe some STRONGER than bears? Also, will you include mythical creatures, or just stay with RL ones?

I hope so! That would be quite awesome, and might give the Super Players a run for their money.

[Ferinex]

LiberalLies: wat? I didn't understand what he was trying to say because of his unintentional bad grammar. I was asking him to clarify. Troll alert.

Edit: On Topic: Some kind of Chimera would be badass.

Edit: I double checked and the Chimera is from Greek mythology - not very suiting. Therefore, this.

[Blaze]

How about dire wolves? Make them hunt in packs, which exponentially increases the danger.

[Fools]

I hope so! That would be quite awesome, and might give the Super Players a run for their money.

That's the last thing we need. Super players need to diversify when they leave the rest of the game behind; in a game like this they should use any leadership abilities and influence to establish rules, common law, estovers, and government. Self improvement is cool, but after a while there is harm in refusing social responsibilities outside of beating people up for others. Noblesse Oblige.

And why are talking about this, I just wanted to state my desire for a notice of greivance. If you guys want circular arguments there's like five of these trash heaps.

[Ferinex]

And why are talking about this, I just wanted to state my desire for a notice of greivance. If you guys want circular arguments there's like five of these trash heaps.

We're trying to talk about new creatures now. Any ideas? I like Blaze's comment on pack animals. Similar to the way deer spawn in groups, only roaming and vicious.

[poltifar]

Dire BEARS. That hunt in packs of 13.

And how would pack animals work? As good as a cart? If they are any worse than a cart, i dont think they'll be used too much.

[Ferinex]

Dire BEARS. That hunt in packs of 13.

And how would pack animals work? As good as a cart? If they are any worse than a cart, i dont think they'll be used too much.

*pictures a pack of angry bears being stopped dead by a rat*

[Hamel]

And how would pack animals work? As good as a cart? If they are any worse than a cart, i dont think they'll be used too much.

I imagine you would have to breed and raise them, instead of building them. They would probably have less storage place and would move faster on grassland, and would be able to traverse just about any terrain. They would also need to be fed.

As far as animal domestication goes, people should have to raise their domesticated animals from other domesticated animals. Maybe with a few super rare wild spawns. They'd be a good deal more rare and valuable that way.

Edit: Ol' Bessie getting caught up in a tornado would be a real tragedy.