Vault question on Legality.

General discussion and socializing.

Re: Vault question on Legality.

Postby DatOneGuy » Sat Jun 25, 2011 9:00 pm

Patchouli_Knowledge wrote:Is loftar the only one I need to talk to in regards to a game-breaking exploit? I may have found a way to make an impenetrable low-tech village that still follows the rules in regards to battering rams. Furthermore it is invulnerable to the loophole of creating a brick-wall to invalidate a defense.

I usually PM both of them this kind of stuff. Might be 'legal' might not be, depends.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
User avatar
DatOneGuy
 
Posts: 5553
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 7:50 am
Location: I'm in Miami, trick.

Re: Vault question on Legality.

Postby NaoWhut » Sat Jun 25, 2011 9:11 pm

you mean like making it so there's
only room for one person to get on
the ram?
ImageImage
User avatar
NaoWhut
 
Posts: 4852
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Location: |.

Re: Vault question on Legality.

Postby Valten21 » Sat Jun 25, 2011 10:20 pm

I kind of wanted to build a ton of minesupports around a house. While it wouldn't be effective, it would be funny.
You may have foiled the plans of BAD-EVIL this time, but there is no rest for the wicked.
User avatar
Valten21
 
Posts: 2053
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 7:40 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Re: Vault question on Legality.

Postby Patchouli_Knowledge » Sat Jun 25, 2011 10:35 pm

Impenetrable to where you can simply let them ram and they will still make no progress. Multiply this problem by 5 times per layer of earth and even wall jumping is no longer going to be viable.
Image
-=The law of inverse desire=- The chances of dropping what you want is the reciprocal of how much you want it.
User avatar
Patchouli_Knowledge
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 1:57 am

Re: Vault question on Legality.

Postby NaoWhut » Sat Jun 25, 2011 10:53 pm

made entirely out of cornerposts? ehh
ImageImage
User avatar
NaoWhut
 
Posts: 4852
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Location: |.

Re: Vault question on Legality.

Postby Patchouli_Knowledge » Sat Jun 25, 2011 11:01 pm

NaoWhut wrote:made entirely out of cornerposts? ehh


That is an extremely inefficient method and only having more viability over strongbox in terms of destructibility, though to be fair, some people are already starting to break strongboxes.
Image
-=The law of inverse desire=- The chances of dropping what you want is the reciprocal of how much you want it.
User avatar
Patchouli_Knowledge
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 1:57 am

Re: Vault question on Legality.

Postby Saphireking65 » Sun Jun 26, 2011 1:44 am

1369 str is needed with a sledgehammer, meaning they need 959 str (with buffs) and full barbarianism to even begin damaging a strongbox
Jackard wrote:
Sotsa wrote:I'm sad to see a wizard has shrunk your cabin and put it in a bottle.
better luck next time.

fucking wizards
User avatar
Saphireking65
 
Posts: 856
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:35 pm
Location: Stormwind

Re: Vault question on Legality.

Postby DrakenRahl » Sun Jun 26, 2011 6:37 am

some people are already starting to break strongboxes.


yep. Been eating 30 MBC / day for awhile.

but i suppose you want a screen shot. will do next box I rape.
Bite Me
DrakenRahl
 
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 5:20 pm

Re: Vault question on Legality.

Postby novaalpha » Sun Jun 26, 2011 6:49 am

Cool story, bro :lol:
User avatar
novaalpha
 
Posts: 1490
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:42 pm
Location: Sparta

Re: Vault question on Legality.

Postby Sarchi » Sun Jun 26, 2011 6:49 am

You rape boxes?
User avatar
Sarchi
 
Posts: 2517
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 1:14 am
Location: 109, -37

PreviousNext

Return to The Inn of Brodgar

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 1 guest