Okay, Shockedfrog, We Can Take The Trees But...

General discussion and socializing.

Re: Okay, Shockedfrog, We Can Take The Trees But...

Postby Hamel » Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:27 pm

StarChaser wrote:I would suspect that they use Bread and other cooked items as well.


Oh yeah, lots and lots of bread. :)
The grumpiest tree you ever did see.

Character: Hamel, previously Chieftain of Ancient Bottleneck, a founding father of the Confederation of Bottleneck. Currently a hibernating soul.
User avatar
Hamel
 
Posts: 356
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:45 pm

Re: Okay, Shockedfrog, We Can Take The Trees But...

Postby Cejer » Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:28 pm

Bah. All this drama is exactly what Shockedfrog is looking for.

Incidentally, I'm now offering a 16 bear salami bounty on the location of shockedfrog's hearth fire.
Last edited by Cejer on Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Cejer
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:14 am

Re: Okay, Shockedfrog, We Can Take The Trees But...

Postby sami1337 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:34 pm

Devour wrote:
sami1337 wrote:unbeatable foxes? Even in mordor they are beatable. Unless mordor has it's own rings i don't know of.


Unbeatable without getting them trapped behind a tree. I presumed that was what he meant by "exploits".


No they can't swim. That's not an exploit. :D
The ones who see things differently.

You can praise them, disagree with them, quote them, disbelieve them, glorify or vilify them. About the only thing you can't do is ignore them.
And while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius.
User avatar
sami1337
 
Posts: 1125
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 1:52 pm

Re: Okay, Shockedfrog, We Can Take The Trees But...

Postby moonshield » Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:35 pm

Seems like we'll win that steel race \o/ (good job shockedfrog)
moonshield
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 2:55 pm

Re: Okay, Shockedfrog, We Can Take The Trees But...

Postby StarChaser » Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:40 pm

:O. Moon hired shockedfrog to steal the coal?... :P
User avatar
StarChaser
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 10:16 am
Location: Australia

Re: Okay, Shockedfrog, We Can Take The Trees But...

Postby Vattic » Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:48 pm

Technically shocked won the steel race, if any of ours was finished and he nabbed it that is.
User avatar
Vattic
 
Posts: 232
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 1:47 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Okay, Shockedfrog, We Can Take The Trees But...

Postby Dragooble » Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:49 pm

no. he just removed the coal and ended our production.
Dragooble
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 1:18 am

Re: Okay, Shockedfrog, We Can Take The Trees But...

Postby sami1337 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:55 pm

moonshield wrote:Seems like we'll win that steel race \o/ (good job shockedfrog)


Haha that and the fact you're wearing breast plate. Pretty rare. Don't tell em it's from pre update though.
The ones who see things differently.

You can praise them, disagree with them, quote them, disbelieve them, glorify or vilify them. About the only thing you can't do is ignore them.
And while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius.
User avatar
sami1337
 
Posts: 1125
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 1:52 pm

Re: Okay, Shockedfrog, We Can Take The Trees But...

Postby loftar » Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:16 pm

Hmm. I'm not quite sure just how to react to this. On one hand, we do intend to make it harder to steal and destroy stuff by implementing some nifty features with regard to land ownership, villages, walls, guarding NPCs &c., but on the other hand, it's not like we intend to make it impossible to steal stuff.

On the one hand, it would make a potentially great difference, since one wouldn't be able to take an entirely new (and therefore scrappable) character to steal stuff. Some time and work would have to be invested in the character before he could steal stuff.

On the other hand, one should, in the end, have to enforce the law by one's own hand. Of course, it is also true that one can't really be expected to be logged in constantly to monitor one's land. Hopefully, some of this will be fixed with tracking and offense points and the like.

In the end though, I very much doubt we'll want to ban players for doing stuff or anything of the like. I must also admit that I laughed a lot while reading this thread. No offense, but it was rather funny. :)

Jorb probably has more to say. I think he's away listening to Bruce Springsteen right now, though.
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
User avatar
loftar
 
Posts: 9045
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am

Re: Okay, Shockedfrog, We Can Take The Trees But...

Postby sami1337 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:21 pm

I don't like the idea of npc's. But a community should have the advantage of community permissions on gates and claims.
The ones who see things differently.

You can praise them, disagree with them, quote them, disbelieve them, glorify or vilify them. About the only thing you can't do is ignore them.
And while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius.
User avatar
sami1337
 
Posts: 1125
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 1:52 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Inn of Brodgar

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 1 guest