
Jalpha wrote:I believe in my interpretation of things.
Danno wrote:Tonkyhonk wrote:you *might* change your view if you can ever keep playing longer than you usually do...although your post shows why you dont last.
I know I keep saying the game gets boring after 2 or 3 weeks, but that doesn't mean I've only played for 2 weeks as a filthy casual.
I have played this game for 1417 hours. One THOUSAND four hundred and seventeen HOURS. And that's not including the amount of time I've spent playing on alt accounts. Just because I'm not on board with the idea of infinitely grinding quality, it doesn't mean I'm a clueless newbie who has no idea how to play the game.
I crossed off some Congress topics because they're not related to war or politics, half of it is just newbs asking about villages or newbs geting killed for stealing from abandoned claims.
wolf1000wolf wrote:Potjeh wrote:I for one think danno is spot on. And I have played at the very top level and seen it's ugly face, which I'd dare guess you guys haven't. I've also played as a casual hermit and got my ass served to me by a player with inferior skill (I managed to trap him in a gate FFS) but much more grind invested in his character, so I know that playing casually is totally nonviable. Haven in it's current state is just a grinding competition, there's is absolutely nothing more to it.
Eh, my personal opinion is HnH is greatly flawed but sadly the only one of its type... Unless you can recommend me a non 3D mmorpg with a mutable world and decent building/crafting system? I haven't had much luck finding one...
jadamkaz wrote:ah i remember my run in with odditown they are good ppl im sure the only reason they killed ME is because they are troll hunters and i was a troll
borka wrote:You're putting soooo much efforts in writing but i didn't read a single sentence of constructive critique - just negative ranting ... and you wonder about sarcasm - come on ...![]()
![]()
LadyV wrote:May I suggest you are not listening? We all want changes. You just dont like the suggestions others have presented.
LadyV wrote:But may I point out the important point to you? Your friends didn't contribute, by your own admission. You chose to allow this and continued anyway.
LadyV wrote:what attracted you to Haven and what you do enjoy most. Then decide what you think would be the things to change. Put forth your suggestions. If they carry weight others will take them to heart. But don't expect it. Everyone has a different reason for playing Haven and it is not all pvp.
Ninijutsu wrote:ANYBODY can start from absolute scratch all by themselves and have a reasonably statted warrior within 3-5 months (700-800 UA/MC). If you join a competent village, it wouldn't take you more than 2 months to get this (and the game is meant to be played with others imo).
Dzedajus wrote:If you're struggling to get at least 100ua then your doing something wrong. Now it should be effortless to get at least 250ua.
And oh god, these circlejerks, guys pls.
Xcom wrote:I find it odd someone can say brick walls are op, factions cant get raided and the grind fest creates titan characters that are unbeatable. Why not log in and challenge the norm. You basically set forth a challenge that you can live up to. Instead its all wasted keystrokes on a forum trying to convince the developer to lower the challenge ratio so you can hop over a lower hoop. Shame on you.
Tonkyhonk wrote:Danno, sorry that you do not remember me, youre making me a sad lil panda.
to be completely honest, i expected you to have spent more hours than that. either way, we all know that counting hours of in-game time does not measure our knowledge of the game, so it really doesnt speak much by itself. not that im saying youre a casual - i myself am a casual actually(though ive spent around 40 weeks on my main). i hope you know what i mean ;_;
Tonkyhonk wrote:now, look, those threads are also congress topics. dont discriminate them just because they didnt entertain you or protagonists were "just newbs".
noob or vet, congress is congress. top faction or just some random hermits, politics is politics.
Tonkyhonk wrote:finally, i thought you knew "sparring" exists in this game when you want to fight someone without losing your char.
i mean, i rather find the beauty that you give a second thought before going for pvp in this game that you may lose most (not all) of your work. if you dont want to take others work away or lose yours by pvp, then you have a choice; sparring.
GrapefruitV wrote:Danno, why do you keep talking about numbers like it is something bad?
Most of the games in the world are based on numbers. It's either getting highest/lowest numbers or getting a certain one faster than others. And I'm not talking about MMOs now, I mean literally ALL existing games
Danno wrote:Ninijutsu wrote:ANYBODY can start from absolute scratch all by themselves and have a reasonably statted warrior within 3-5 months (700-800 UA/MC). If you join a competent village, it wouldn't take you more than 2 months to get this (and the game is meant to be played with others imo).
Why is it that players have to invest a minimum of 2 months before they can compete? Sheesh, most people uninstall a game if the tutorial is longer than 5 minutes, or they quit an online game room if the players don't ready up within 20 seconds. Gamers want to play the game, not watch the time go by.
Danno wrote:Ninijutsu wrote:ANYBODY can start from absolute scratch all by themselves and have a reasonably statted warrior within 3-5 months (700-800 UA/MC). If you join a competent village, it wouldn't take you more than 2 months to get this (and the game is meant to be played with others imo).
Why is it that players have to invest a minimum of 2 months before they can compete? Sheesh, most people uninstall a game if the tutorial is longer than 5 minutes, or they quit an online game room if the players don't ready up within 20 seconds. Gamers want to play the game, not watch the time go by.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 1 guest