Tree Formula Discussion

[novaalpha]

Once again alpha made himself the laughing stock of the forums. Not that I am a big fan of Leksar, but thanks for this one

Lately every post of yours shows how little you know.

Plus that gibberish leksar posted is incorrect so

[Leksar]

Plus that gibberish leksar posted is incorrect so

u can deny it.. but, wait a minute, u can't

[novaalpha]

Plus that gibberish leksar posted is incorrect so

u can deny it.. but, wait a minute, u can't

Ok Please, continue using your great, correct formula, and tell all your friends about it so they use it too

[DatOneGuy]

I've had three listed trees so far break that formula Leksar, but givne that it is an Anonymous entry, it's hard to say. I guess I'll have to reconsider using public data, as I've already had 6-7 lines of blatant trolling.

[Mashadar]

Well, Leksar's formula works for my (very limited) data from W4 and it also works for the values from W3 posted here.
The average deviation is 2.6, which is close to what it should be (2.7), assuming the deviation range is ±5.

But yeah, accepting public data is problematic, as there'll be always some wrong values, even if they were all submitted in good faith.
Better stick to using values from a few people who do their bookkeeping diligently.

[Leksar]

how is it going ?

[burgingham]

Everyone quit.

[screwbag]

I didn't quit... Still taking notes... Will report in when I have done my experiments on another dozen or so trees...

[ElGato]

I didn't quit... Still taking notes... Will report in when I have done my experiments on another dozen or so trees...

dumbass...
he meant DoG quit.