Salem release

General discussion and socializing.

Re: Salem release

Postby burgingham » Fri Apr 17, 2015 5:54 am

Oh, excuse me. If they only kill players for no reason every now and then it is of course totally fine and they deserve a medal for holding back their urges.
User avatar
burgingham
 
Posts: 8486
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:58 pm

Re: Salem release

Postby MarpTarpton » Fri Apr 17, 2015 5:57 am

burgingham wrote:Oh, excuse me. If they only kill players for no reason every now and then it is of course totally fine and they deserve a medal for holding back their urges.


Thank you for understanding. :)
MarpTarpton
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 5:48 am

Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, III

Postby Claeyt » Fri Apr 17, 2015 6:00 am

MarpTarpton wrote:
burgingham wrote:You forgot to mention the awesome feature of developers randomly killing off players when they are bored.


I'd just like to point out that this barely ever happens.


Also, Claeyt, VQ #27 is complete. Please come back to the Salem forums for more information on VQ #28.


:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
jorb wrote:(jwhitehorn) You are an ungrateful, spoiled child!


Kralith wrote:You have not to like Claeyt, but to wish to kill someone in an oven on a concentration camp is an absolutely NO-GO!
User avatar
Claeyt
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 9:02 am

Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, III

Postby falconsadist » Fri Apr 17, 2015 6:03 am

txtrung0 wrote:
Jackard wrote:
burgingham wrote:You forgot to mention the awesome feature of developers randomly killing off players when they are bored.

Tell me some more...

http://forum.salemthegame.com/viewtopic ... t=MM+tribe

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Yes, that terrible day when the Chief/JC killed his alts and shut down his own faction.
falconsadist
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2014 6:43 pm

Re: Salem release

Postby Claeyt » Fri Apr 17, 2015 6:21 am

burgingham wrote:Oh, excuse me. If they only kill players for no reason every now and then it is of course totally fine and they deserve a medal for holding back their urges.

Again, I don't think they've ever actually killed a player as Dev's.

MarpTarpton wrote:Thank you for understanding. :)

Although, We never did get that whole story Marp. Did you kill <The Russian> and then <Player 1> using dev powers so as to change the political landscape of Salem? :D

You're in a safe place here, you can whisper it to us. We'll never tell.
jorb wrote:(jwhitehorn) You are an ungrateful, spoiled child!


Kralith wrote:You have not to like Claeyt, but to wish to kill someone in an oven on a concentration camp is an absolutely NO-GO!
User avatar
Claeyt
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 9:02 am

Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, III

Postby jorb » Fri Apr 17, 2015 7:28 am

Claeyt wrote:I'd say it's more like we have a general trolling argument with each other randomly and he makes a lot better latte than the last barista who was a strange little lazy hairy swedish guy who spouted weird stuff about the Masons and the NSA.


Ah, I thought I smelled the foul reek of Claegue all over my pristine forums.

You, sir, can go somplace else and run your filthy little commie mouth.

Claeyt banned for being Claeyt. No one should infer anything about any sort of general forum rule from his sad example.

He's an edge case.
"The psychological trials of dwellers in the last times will be equal to the physical trials of the martyrs. In order to face these trials we must be living in a different world."

-- Hieromonk Seraphim Rose
User avatar
jorb
 
Posts: 18436
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:07 am
Location: Here, there and everywhere.

Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, III

Postby MarpTarpton » Fri Apr 17, 2015 7:51 am

jorb wrote:Claeyt banned for being Claeyt. No one should infer anything about any sort of general forum rule from his sad example.


Claeyt's VQ #28 completed.

Jorb VQ# 12 completed.

What a productive day.

USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST
MarpTarpton
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 5:48 am

Re: Salem release

Postby txtrung0 » Fri Apr 17, 2015 2:27 pm

Claeyt? Marp? Answer me! Nooooo....
Guess it's up to me to keep our pride up :cry:
txtrung0
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 7:19 am

Re: Salem release

Postby loftar » Fri Apr 17, 2015 2:32 pm

txtrung0 wrote:Guess it's up to me to keep our pride up

Please do, but I think it's for the best not to have the Claegue spreading corruption through that pride anyway. :)
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
User avatar
loftar
 
Posts: 9045
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am

Re: Salem release

Postby Avu » Fri Apr 17, 2015 4:02 pm

Nobody (or hardly nobody) is claiming salem is bad because it's a bad game it's bad because one of the devs is unprofessional.

btw marp is one of the devs; well if it's really him, he's not the unprofessional one from what I can tell but hey guilt by association.
"Since all men count themselves righteous, and since
no righteous man raises his hand against the innocent,
a man need only strike another to make him evil."
User avatar
Avu
 
Posts: 3000
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:00 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Inn of Brodgar

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot], PetalBot [Bot] and 4 guests