Ignus wrote:he moves in to the ad hominems
Ignus wrote:ranty tin-hat
Hypocrite?
Ignus wrote:Well I'm very sorry, but opinions can be empirically wrong.
Yes, I believe your opinion is empirically wrong.
Ignus wrote:Besides, internet arguments aren't there for me to convince you or vice versa, it is for one person to pick apart another for the public to watch. They can make their own minds up.
I already stated basically in so many words that I agree to disagree. But since you want to provide substanceless and "rather cliché" ad hominem attacks like calling me a tin foil hat wearer (for believing in individual rights?); You start by arguing with me about the word homophobia. Then when you lose that argument when I smack you down with facts and make you look like a dumb ass, you start "moving in to the ad hominems" by calling me a "ranty tin-hat". What about my original question bro?
dagrimreefah wrote: How would you go about defining someone who has a fear of the same?
You gonna answer that any time soon or are you going to back pedal into ad hominems again? XD
Ignus wrote:And "media fed ideologies"? Rather cliché.
"Ranty tin-hat"... Rather cliché.
EDIT: Don't get mad at me because you're too stupid to understand how and why politicians use particular demographics of people for political gain.