Saying "no one cares" means this faction is considered as really weak, newbish, unstable and unsignificant withing the game environment. "Care" for major factions is something to deal with really dangerous. However, when weak is causing a crash to get an advantage it should be highlighted. Those crashes cannot prevent us from continuing the siege/ hurt somehow. A.D. itself if it uses fair methods isn't a matter to care about, but crashes are. I hope I explained my point clearly.cobaltjones wrote:I didn't say anything about validity. I said that it's insincere to make a thread specifically designed to defame a certain faction and then later claim that "no one cares" about that faction. Whether or not the OP is true, this thread was still created and has thrived on the fact that people actually give a shit about AD, regardless of what bj would like you to believe.
Don't blame our brethen for our quilty. Dis is the one who suggested sieging A.D. and leading the siege. Ainran are just following their ally duty.Ainran are being faggots.
Also, I wish to highlight the fact that exploits and broken game mechanics are used in both sides.
http://i.imgur.com/8RfKg.jpg - A.D. trying to build unbreakable statues all on our way. Currently they were noted in building statues around of one more pocket for rams we made. Is A.D. an absolute victim?
