by Flame » Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:54 am
Mmh... so u say that is way more easy to run from a fight without loose almost no hp. To me, this is a gain, 'cuz i ALWAYS run from a fight.
But for two fighters, is almost nonsense. This fix miss something.
Let me think a little. I whould suggest something that whould allow me to have a chance to run, but also that allow other to kill grievers without the need to call 59 player vs 1 well armored.
I don't know the battle system enough. I know few techs just to punch a deer or a fox, that's all. What i'm going to say is what probably already is.
maibe we can use better the 2 kind of defenses. (Blue defense and armor defense)
The "battle defense" is the blue bar and means you'r ability in move-fight-avoid. Just like now, it can be lowered during the fight.
YOU CAN MOVE if you keep looking at your target (example - ctrl movement). In that case your battle defense will not be lowered. You're just moving around in the fight.
But if you don't move with ctrl movement, then you're Not facing your enemy (you're running away) and then you'r battle defence don't work cuz you're ignoring him. Only you'r armor defense works. Also if running, a metal man is a metal man and hurt him with a punch is quite hard and no str or stats should allow to a punch to harm seriously an armored man.
What if i use swords or arrows?
If i use swords on a running man, the armor value is halfed. You can hit weak points of an armor if you'r enemy don't avoid this, so the sword is more efficace also when it is crap q.
And what happens with arrows?
Arrows are STRONG against a man that run. Is way more hard to aim, but the warrior can't defende-avoid-use shield, so the arrows put the armor value to 1/3. If you're smart and you see that you'r enemies aren't following you (means they'r aiming), it's better if you run a little and face them again, to avoid a ugly dead on the back.
Plus i whould add to the shields a real value. An armor should not defende you from arrows so easily. Wear a shield can nullify arrows damage. Armor can't nullify arrows damage (but surely, if you're facing them and you have an average armor, the damage will be low. But not 0. NEVER 0)
This way, a punch is not so efficace against a well armored man if you can't punch him in the face (so when he's running).
A sword is efficace in any timing.
Arrows are more efficace from the back, cuz the shield is a serious obstacle (and not the armor all alone)
Mah. This is what i was able to think, not knowing the battle system. Throwed a bunch of ideas hoping aren't useless, but anyway i'm not a fighter and i'll not fight.
I'll always run. XD