by TeckXKnight » Wed Apr 01, 2015 1:02 pm
I know this is a troll but I'll bite. The article is idiotic in that it even acknowledges the idea of killing off predators -- removing predators causes explosions in herbivore populations and then mass die-offs. This isn't something that's theoretical either, we see that problem every day in the US thanks to our elimination of predators such as wolves, as the article expands upon. Deer populations are a menace both to humans and themselves because we've removed their predators. The article briefly talks about habitat destruction but an unchecked herbivore will completely desolate their niche if given the opportunity.
Another issue is that carnivores can't become herbivores. This isn't something that can be changed with simple selective breeding either. Any cat, big or small, that goes without meat will suffer absolute atrophy of their bones, damage to and failure of nearly all of their vital organs, blindness, deafness, and eventually death. Similar situations are true for every single carnivorous animal out there. It's actually so important for cats to eat meat that they've given up other taste buds to discourage sampling other foods, such as sweetness. To make any carnivore into an herbivore you'd need to remove their desire for meat, metabolic processes, physiological design, jaws and teeth, stomach, feet, sociological group behavior (it's really bad for herbivores to be solitary animals), and I'm sure just about everything else that makes them their own species. Essentially, what the article is asking for, is the extinction of all of these species, as anything that came out of the result of the necessary genetic manipulation to make a carnivore an herbivore would be so genetically distant from their species of origin as to fall into a different taxonomy entirely and would be incapable of producing offspring/that can reproduce with their former species.
So if everything they wanted came true we'd have 1 of 2 scenarios.
1) Herbivores become absolutely dominant and all species that can consume meat as part of their diet are killed off. Most plant species go extinct and most herbivores face near absolute or absolute die-offs as well.
2) Herbivores become absolutely dominant and it becomes humanity's job to kill as many of them as is possible. This one may actually not align with this movement's ideology though as humans are therefore causing 'suffering' to the species.
Then there's always the question about what you're doing with species like arctic penguins. Turning them vegan wouldn't leave them with any food sources at all. What are they going to eat, ice?