Interesting declaration.
I've never heard of you before, though. It's my impression that many potentates used strength of arms to carve themselves a lordship out of the wilderness, back in the day; "might makes right" and all that. Reinforced obviously by the necessary leadership qualities such as the Charisma to sway followers and the Perception/Intelligence to rule as they see fit, to quell conspirators/enemies of the land and reckless upstarts alike. Peasants will have their superstitions; their leaders might be blessed, being untouchable in Melee and been bestowed with Constitution enough to be proof from poison. Without more than the basest claims to prowess in the field on battle, I fear that overlords of mere brute Strength, terror-inspiring as it is, have their dominions subverted sooner than they aspire to.
Pumpkin wrote:I am stronger than every hunter with three exceptions,
Which begs the notion: Without some idea of stats, how can one make the above statement with total lack of fear of reprisal? Are you just fucking crazy, or are you really able to back it up? I'm not really minded to care if you claim the whole map, just asserting that there will likely always be a bit of doubt, a notion of illegitimacy, until proven otherwise. Hopefully, such an event will not come to fruition resulting of the demise of boorish fools such as I.
Curious George is curious.