Attack on Cakeport

[ARCHIVE FOR WORLDS 1&2]Forum for discussing in game politics, village relations and matters of justice.

Re: Attack on Cakeport

Postby Caradon » Sun Dec 13, 2009 5:56 pm

stopgag on village claims agreed upon
Trolls- Dont argue with it, Don't reason with it, Just DOMINATE! Southpark S10-E5
User avatar
Caradon
 
Posts: 347
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 6:10 pm

Re: Attack on Cakeport

Postby Cain » Sun Dec 13, 2009 10:25 pm

Potjeh wrote:Sure it would be badly broken. But what we have right now is hideously broken. Basically, right now you can't play if you're not willing to play 14 hours a day, grinding bears all the time. I don't know about you, but I think that's not fun at all. It should be possible to play casually.

And yeah, the stopgap measure should be removed once combat is rebalanced.


Except that the system is so fucked that even if you do play 14 hours a day there's nothing you can do. No matter how strong you are, as soon as you leave a scent you can be summoned from offline and killed.
I once dreamt of crafting beautiful thane's rings... then I discovered Big Bear Bangers. Now I smash beautiful things.
User avatar
Cain
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:35 pm
Location: Wesleyan University

Re: Attack on Cakeport

Postby juhubert » Sun Dec 13, 2009 11:35 pm

warrri wrote:
Chakravanti wrote:Innsmouth wasn't involved either. They raided just because they could. For shits, giggles and loot.

Im pretty sure the lawspeaker of innsmouth was involved the shittest shit there is. Oh wait, thats you!


sorry to proof you wrong warri, but i was the lawspeaker of innsmouth ;)

it´s just that chak was - past tense, because we al left innsmouth - the guy with the most connections , be it mercantile or others, so he acted as a galleons figure to the h&h community.

i know, that he wasn´t well liked by all fractions or different people, but as much as i´m concerned, innsmouth just got raided, because they could.
Wanderer through worlds and ages
User avatar
juhubert
 
Posts: 398
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 7:01 pm
Location: World Central

Re: Attack on Cakeport

Postby warrri » Sun Dec 13, 2009 11:53 pm

juhubert wrote:
warrri wrote:
Chakravanti wrote:Innsmouth wasn't involved either. They raided just because they could. For shits, giggles and loot.

Im pretty sure the lawspeaker of innsmouth was involved the shittest shit there is. Oh wait, thats you!


sorry to proof you wrong warri, but i was the lawspeaker of innsmouth ;)

it´s just that chak was - past tense, because we al left innsmouth - the guy with the most connections , be it mercantile or others, so he acted as a galleons figure to the h&h community.

i know, that he wasn´t well liked by all fractions or different people, but as much as i´m concerned, innsmouth just got raided, because they could.


I think he was lawspeaker before he betrayed Xanadu and quit, thats what you told me at least. But It doesnt matter who was the actual lawspeaker, its common knowledge innsmouth was "chaks village".
The world I love The tears I drop To be part of The wave can't stop
Ever wonder if it's all for you
The world I love The trains I hop To be part of The wave can't stop
Come and tell me when it's time to
User avatar
warrri
 
Posts: 1033
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 5:55 pm

Re: Attack on Cakeport

Postby juhubert » Mon Dec 14, 2009 12:22 am

warrri wrote:
juhubert wrote:
sorry to proof you wrong warri, but i was the lawspeaker of innsmouth ;)

it´s just that chak was - past tense, because we al left innsmouth - the guy with the most connections , be it mercantile or others, so he acted as a galleons figure to the h&h community.

i know, that he wasn´t well liked by all fractions or different people, but as much as i´m concerned, innsmouth just got raided, because they could.


I think he was lawspeaker before he betrayed Xanadu and quit, thats what you told me at least. But It doesnt matter who was the actual lawspeaker, its common knowledge innsmouth was "chaks village".


i just wanted to say, that - at the time the raid was carried out - not he, but i was. and i´m aware that he was the best known face of our village, well, he even founded it.

if they were after him or his goods, why they took the stuff of other hard working people? clan liability? or just for fun and cheese ;)
Wanderer through worlds and ages
User avatar
juhubert
 
Posts: 398
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 7:01 pm
Location: World Central

Re: Attack on Cakeport

Postby Leonard » Mon Dec 14, 2009 2:06 pm

I think he was lawspeaker before he betrayed Xanadu and quit, thats what you told me at least. But It doesnt matter who was the actual lawspeaker, its common knowledge innsmouth was "chaks village".


So what? If you want a player dead, kill the player, and don't rape a village and take their stuff. I dont get it why innocent (?) bystanders have to suffer for deeds another one has done. No flame, just something to think about.
User avatar
Leonard
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 3:44 pm
Location: Vienna

Re: Attack on Cakeport

Postby Avu » Mon Dec 14, 2009 2:09 pm

The whole we went to kill chak is just propaganda. They went to eat cheese show the world they could do it and bait xanadu into reacting.
"Since all men count themselves righteous, and since
no righteous man raises his hand against the innocent,
a man need only strike another to make him evil."
User avatar
Avu
 
Posts: 3000
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:00 pm

Previous

Return to [ARCHIVE]In Congress Assembled

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 0 guests