The King is back

[Potjeh]

I have let worse shit through. Loftar has implemented a fix for the problem, but there will be no retroactive resurrections or the like.

Whats worse than loosing a 23m char? Granted you have a strong ancestor then, but meh.

Losing an entire village because combat is hideously broken and you can't do shit to protect yourself when you log off?

[kimya]

I have let worse shit through. Loftar has implemented a fix for the problem, but there will be no retroactive resurrections or the like.

Whats worse than loosing a 23m char? Granted you have a strong ancestor then, but meh.

Losing an entire village because combat is hideously broken and you can't do shit to protect yourself when you log off?

well, ppl taking advantage of this broken system and raiding your village. thats worse. which reminds me, hasnt wv been doing this

/edit
was confusing

[warrri]

Not even in the mood to answer such obviously retarded comments. If you cant see the difference maybe just stop posting at all. Its getting annoying reading your crap already.

[burgingham]

Long live the king:




This is just the beginning...

[burgingham]

I have let worse shit through. Loftar has implemented a fix for the problem, but there will be no retroactive resurrections or the like.

I do btw totally understand this kind of action (lets call it reaction), I would have done the same.

None the less let me point out the flaws of your reaction. There were several factions (who were not really factions, but bunches of players) complaining about current ingame situations. Daring to quit, all of them (in one way or the other). As a dev I would have followed your course of action without even letting someone asking why. Maybe you will do the same with me, but still I got one question:


Why are you guys not caring about a 23 million lp char who got killed due to a bug? (the objection which occured before of an also bugged combat system is invalid here, which I am sure you see when considering regular logic). I totally know he deserves to be dead, but to let him die just because it makes your lifes easier? That I do not understand...

[burgingham]

.

[DeadlyPencil]

Have they "revived" characters in the past? if they haven't why would you expect them to set a precedent and revive him.

[burgingham]

. grmpf again

[burgingham]

Have they "revived" characters in the past? if they haven't why would you expect them to set a precedent and revive him.

they have... a char who walked into water by accident

[Jackard]

Have they "revived" characters in the past? if they haven't why would you expect them to set a precedent and revive him.

yep

bad move imo