QL 82 clay is serious business

[ARCHIVE FOR WORLDS 1&2]Forum for discussing in game politics, village relations and matters of justice.

QL 82 clay is serious business

Postby Delamore » Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:28 pm

User avatar
Delamore
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:11 am

Re: QL 82 clay is serious business

Postby kLauE » Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:50 pm

solid fail xanadu :lol:
User avatar
kLauE
 
Posts: 1085
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 12:58 am

Re: QL 82 clay is serious business

Postby Zelacks » Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:54 pm

BY the looks of it... now no one can get the Q82 clay? Wow....
Around Zelacks -- NEVER RELAX
User avatar
Zelacks
 
Posts: 90
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: QL 82 clay is serious business

Postby Delamore » Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:56 pm

Zelacks wrote:BY the looks of it... now no one can get the Q82 clay? Wow....

I sure can.
User avatar
Delamore
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:11 am

Re: QL 82 clay is serious business

Postby Potjeh » Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:16 pm

Wait, villages can overlap? That doesn't seem right to me.
Image Bottleneck
User avatar
Potjeh
 
Posts: 11811
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: QL 82 clay is serious business

Postby sabinati » Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:22 pm

as long as the inner circles don't touch
User avatar
sabinati
 
Posts: 15513
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
Location: View active topics

Re: QL 82 clay is serious business

Postby Potjeh » Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:26 pm

It wasn't like that before. We had a second idol in Bottleneck that couldn't be activated because it was too close to the existing village, and distance between it and the closest statue was bigger than the distance between these two idols.

Anyway, I'd just like to say that there should be a minimal distance between two village claims, because as it is not even a village claim can protect your personal claim from a determined griefer.
Image Bottleneck
User avatar
Potjeh
 
Posts: 11811
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: QL 82 clay is serious business

Postby Delamore » Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:34 pm

Potjeh wrote:It wasn't like that before. We had a second idol in Bottleneck that couldn't be activated because it was too close to the existing village, and distance between it and the closest statue was bigger than the distance between these two idols.

Anyway, I'd just like to say that there should be a minimal distance between two village claims, because as it is not even a village claim can protect your personal claim from a determined griefer.

Unless your personal claim is in the deep red zone of a village right?
You mean as in it can be protected and your statement goes out the window?
User avatar
Delamore
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:11 am

Re: QL 82 clay is serious business

Postby Potjeh » Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:49 pm

OK, you win.

Still, overlapping villages just seems wrong to me.
Image Bottleneck
User avatar
Potjeh
 
Posts: 11811
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: QL 82 clay is serious business

Postby maltmaker » Wed Nov 18, 2009 1:04 am

goodness am i jealous of you. how much do you charge for a few cubbords full of it?
User avatar
maltmaker
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 11:33 pm

Next

Return to [ARCHIVE]In Congress Assembled

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 0 guests