Burning moves should always be quicker than using moves

Thoughts on the further development of Haven & Hearth? Feel free to opine!

Burning moves should always be quicker than using moves

Postby banok » Thu Oct 01, 2015 8:24 pm

I'm not going to pretend to be some pvp/combat guru so I'm open to criticism here, but seems to me the CTRL+# move burn cooldown is really bad.

Maybe it shouldn't be instant but often its more cooldown than actually using the move, which is stupid. so imo it shouldn't have more than 20 cooldown, probably should have less than 20 really so there is always at least some point in doing it.

PS: i'd really appreciate if I could rebind it to something less awkward also.
User avatar
banok
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 3:59 am
Location: Homeless by choice

Re: Burning moves should always be quicker than using moves

Postby Sevenless » Thu Oct 01, 2015 8:27 pm

I thought it was always the cooldown of the move itself?

I've always felt it should be like 1/2 the move's cooldown or something. Otherwise it's only a feature for burning moves that will hurt you (tusk romp reflect) or you physically can't use (IP based stuff).

By making it half the move cooldown, there's some deck styles where refreshing a move to try and get a weakness hit is better than chewing a block. I like the theory of that style of play.
Lucky: haven is so quirky
Lucky: can be so ugly, can be so heartwarming
Sevenless: it is life

The Art of Herding
W16 Casting Rod Cheatsheet
Explanation of the logic behind the cooking system
User avatar
Sevenless
 
Posts: 7607
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 3:55 am
Location: Canada

Re: Burning moves should always be quicker than using moves

Postby Hervarth » Thu Oct 01, 2015 8:36 pm

As you make it faster and faster you reduce the point of "deckbuilding" and the importance of the (hypothetical, right now, chop op) meta more and more. I think if it was the cooldown of the move itself it would be ok, I dont think any lower than that is a good idea.
_Gunnar's alt
User avatar
Hervarth
 
Posts: 301
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 4:24 pm

Re: Burning moves should always be quicker than using moves

Postby rye130 » Thu Oct 01, 2015 8:37 pm

Hervarth wrote:As you make it faster and faster you reduce the point of "deckbuilding" and the importance of the (hypothetical, right now, chop op) meta more and more. I think if it was the cooldown of the move itself it would be ok, I dont think any lower than that is a good idea.


Exactly what I was going to say. Discarding shouldn't be a normal thing you use really if your deck is designed intelligently. Lowering the cooldown makes it a normal part of the combat strategy.
User avatar
rye130
 
Posts: 2552
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:41 pm

Re: Burning moves should always be quicker than using moves

Postby Gabula » Thu Oct 01, 2015 9:03 pm

"Burning" a card needs to be a penalty, it's the result of having a bad deck. I like it the way it works right now with the current cooldown.
Gabula
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2015 9:05 pm

Re: Burning moves should always be quicker than using moves

Postby Sevenless » Thu Oct 01, 2015 9:41 pm

Gabula wrote:"Burning" a card needs to be a penalty, it's the result of having a bad deck. I like it the way it works right now with the current cooldown.


It's still a penalty if it's half the cooldown.

As it is currently, there's almost no point burning moves except to prevent deck locks (which will only happen in terribad decks anyway). You might as well just use them.
Lucky: haven is so quirky
Lucky: can be so ugly, can be so heartwarming
Sevenless: it is life

The Art of Herding
W16 Casting Rod Cheatsheet
Explanation of the logic behind the cooking system
User avatar
Sevenless
 
Posts: 7607
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 3:55 am
Location: Canada

Re: Burning moves should always be quicker than using moves

Postby Necroliter » Thu Oct 01, 2015 10:25 pm

If you want to use any IP moves - you need to have more cards in deck. RNG is fun, but five minutes ago i was fighting bats and got only IP/attacks on the start of the combat, so i was running trying to drop some cards in the search of defensive move. Funny enough - there is 5 cards (2 IP + 3 attacks) in my deck that i`ve got on start and 6 defensive moves that would be good and nice in that situation. I managed to draw all 5 cards that i can`t use on the start of combat.

Will be nice if we can have one preselected move to be used on start of the combat (it was mentioned before) or if we will be able to discard moves a bit faster.
Also first solution (with preselected combat move) will save those, who TP into a Chop and die before map loads.
Necroliter
 
Posts: 206
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:29 pm

Re: Burning moves should always be quicker than using moves

Postby Granger » Thu Oct 01, 2015 11:14 pm

It would be nice if we could stack the deck how we want it to make it deterministic, so i would know what the first cards would be, and in what order.

I mean, this is my combat school, so i should know it in and out and not be surprised every time i start combat.
⁎ Mon Mar 22, 2010 ✝ Thu Jan 23, 2020
User avatar
Granger
 
Posts: 9264
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 2:00 pm

Re: Burning moves should always be quicker than using moves

Postby Lunarius_Haberdash » Fri Oct 02, 2015 12:42 am

Sevenless wrote:I thought it was always the cooldown of the move itself?

I've always felt it should be like 1/2 the move's cooldown or something. Otherwise it's only a feature for burning moves that will hurt you (tusk romp reflect) or you physically can't use (IP based stuff).

By making it half the move cooldown, there's some deck styles where refreshing a move to try and get a weakness hit is better than chewing a block. I like the theory of that style of play.


Agreed.
jorb: I don't want *your* money. You are rude and boring. Go away.
Sevenless: We already know real life has some pretty shitty game mechanics, it's why we're here instead.
Avu: The end is near it has finally come to pass: I agree with Lunarius...
Shubla: There are also other reasons to play this game than to maximize your stat gain.
User avatar
Lunarius_Haberdash
 
Posts: 1478
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:14 am

Re: Burning moves should always be quicker than using moves

Postby Hervarth » Fri Oct 02, 2015 2:51 am

Granger wrote:It would be nice if we could stack the deck how we want it to make it deterministic, so i would know what the first cards would be, and in what order.

I mean, this is my combat school, so i should know it in and out and not be surprised every time i start combat.


You can manipulate the rng to some extent, by putting in multiples. The cards are not completely randomly distributed through the deck.
_Gunnar's alt
User avatar
Hervarth
 
Posts: 301
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 4:24 pm

Next

Return to Critique & Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 174 guests