jorb wrote:I am presently exhausted from twelve hours of non-stop developing and I am going to bed.
sabinati wrote:do you expect me to just check the forum constantly, fuck off
Bawhoppen wrote:Ability to increase inventory by paying is a bit silly though, is it really necessary?
Granger wrote:Fuck off, please go grow yourself some decency.
Astarisk wrote:Siege & Kingdoms
--------------------
We have no immediate changes planned, except in that we would like to make some changes to Kingdoms, to soften the initial rush toward claiming as much land, and as many opponents, as possible. Feel free to make suggestions.
Some changes to sieging is going to be needed, else nothing will be sieged in the coming world. With the way the current mechanics interact, all the larger factions are going to aim to create an impossible to raid mega-structure now that they have a chance to start their village fresh.
MagicManICT wrote:inb4 "pay2win!!!!11one"
Potjeh wrote:They're using swords as throwing weapons now? Damn cheaters!
MagicManICT wrote:Most raiders aren't into choking another man's chicken. They can do some pretty gay shit, but that's usually the line.
Kaios wrote:Recent updates have been lackluster and you haven't really changed anything with kingdoms or siege at all or really made any of the suggested changes but okay.
Redlaw wrote:With kingdoms a massive world would be better I think lol.
loftar wrote:Well, the point was that it's been on our minds since we added those things, more or less.
loftar wrote:Redlaw wrote:With kingdoms a massive world would be better I think lol.
Area-wise, not a very large degree of the current map has been claimed by kingdoms.
Users browsing this forum: Python-Requests [Bot], Trendiction [Bot] and 4 guests