jorb wrote:I mean... it's not like you couldn't have a point here. Maybe steam should be long-term stable instead, and we should run quick and fast worlds here?
Ultimately, the decision is up to you and to tell you the truth I don't particularly care which route you choose to go, either way is fine with me.
My personal opinion on this though is that people are being downright retarded saying that the Steam fans would prefer the longer worlds. Absolutely 0 evidence of that being true, especially when the lion's share of veteran players don't even like longer worlds. Yes, even those that say they do, they're chatting shit, they quit just as early as I do into the world for all the same reasons that I and most others do.
I am firmly of the opinion that Haven has a very very poor endgame which loses its spark of excitement and crosses the territory into being a chore to play. Very boring and very demanding. The early and mid-game are demanding too but they're in no way boring. The journey to end game is where the fun lies even though the destination sucks ass.
Steam players will run into the above too only you run the risk of them dropping the game after a single world once the monotony kicks in and it starts feeling like a second job and a waste of time. This feeling cannot be avoided with how the game currently is. I believe they'll appreciate the shorter wipes for the same reasons we do.
But hey, if you wanna go the other route, so be it, like I said I don't actually give a shit which way you decide to go so long as one way or another I have a fresh world to play next month.