Curiosity LP Gains - An Objective Ranking

[Jackard]

Nice thread, interesting OP. But remember to report problem posts instead of replying to them.

[Blxz]

Another critique, I like that you have done LP/hour underneath. However, does it read better if you put the values in brackets next to your first list? I think it would be really convenient to see at a glance the differences without having to glance up and down at the 2 lists; a problem that may well grow as further curiosities are discovered.

[Ekoepanda]

Even based on static calc its a good job regarding to the popular beliefs. Cone caw is not that bad ^^
Thank you

[Ginnungagap]

It's the same way games on Facebook are based.

Some items take forever, but give a lot of LP.
But doing other items that take little time, and actually playing the game and constantly keeping up with them, you'll make more LP in the end.

[Grable]

So what you're saying is that Ant Empress is now the epic loot of H&H?

[Scilly_guy]

They're (Ant Empress) one of the best foods too, 5th best in terms of hunger per fep, if they weren't a good curio too you'd be better off eating them.

If/when this table is base LP of q10 then it will be useful. It shouldn't be hard to reverse engineer.

if q7 cone cow gives 58lp @ %136LA then q10 base is (((58/136)*100)/7)*10... these numbers are off the top of my head but give about 60, can anyone confirm.

(((LP/LA)*100)/Q)*10

[ItsFunToLose]

They're (Ant Empress) one of the best foods too, 5th best in terms of hunger per fep, if they weren't a good curio too you'd be better off eating them.

If/when this table is base LP of q10 then it will be useful. It shouldn't be hard to reverse engineer.

if q7 cone cow gives 58lp @ %136LA then q10 base is (((58/136)*100)/7)*10... these numbers are off the top of my head but give about 60, can anyone confirm.

(((LP/LA)*100)/Q)*10

this table is based on Q10.
All the numbers listed here use the wiki numbers, meaning their Q10 equivalents, then converted into 360% learning ability gains.

[Onionfighter]

Nice work. I started something like this on the wiki: http://ringofbrodgar.com/wiki/Curiosity_Table, but I had problems with displaying the information.

Anyway, the 3.6 multiplier really doesn't matter because the numbers are all relative.

[ItsFunToLose]

Nice work. I started something like this on the wiki: http://ringofbrodgar.com/wiki/Curiosity_Table, but I had problems with displaying the information.

Anyway, the 3.6 multiplier really doesn't matter because the numbers are all relative.

Nice extension on the table. That table didn't used to include those last two columns seeing that table on the wiki is actually what inspired me to calculate this out. nice work. hopefully this thread can die and the information can be inserted to the wiki

[daemmonium]

The main problem with aproximations and calculations currently is the Quality.
First of all because we dont know YET the exact formula. Second of all because the extra LP from extra Quality gets (or maybe not) multiplied from LA.
So still it's a little bit odd. At least for me that I'm lazy