another way of doing it is placeing the pseudo-claim on the actual item itself
-
ninja_yodeler
- Posts: 1880
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:15 am
- Location: Look outside your window.
Re: Pseudo-Claims
yes but sometimes alt claims arnt convienient or possible at the time, i like this idea, as long as it remains non summonable
another way of doing it is placeing the pseudo-claim on the actual item itself
another way of doing it is placeing the pseudo-claim on the actual item itself
Phaen wrote: RIP Homicidal Ninja
Let us reflect upon the good he was able to do during his short time in the hearthlands.
Let us remind ourselves of his bravery and willingness to fight for the safety of his friends!
Let us hope he can surpass his previous achievements in his future lives.
<3
-
Zirikana
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 7:36 pm
Re: Pseudo-Claims
what if the "pseudo-claim" idea was framed more like a "keeping an eye on it" function?
You could "watch" or "keep an eye on" a boat or wagon or whatever for as long as you were logged in, not AFK, and within some reasonable distance. Then, if someone took it there could be a theft scent associated with it. Otherwise, finder's keeper's. Would that solve your problem?
You could "watch" or "keep an eye on" a boat or wagon or whatever for as long as you were logged in, not AFK, and within some reasonable distance. Then, if someone took it there could be a theft scent associated with it. Otherwise, finder's keeper's. Would that solve your problem?
"Bein' a minotaur is a lot like bein' a regular human except moo" - J. Rowland
-
pyrale
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:50 pm
Re: Pseudo-Claims
Invisible claim yielding scents = bad, no matter wether they can be summoned or not.
Making a visible claim that takes scents but does not require black skills is another debate.
Making a visible claim that takes scents but does not require black skills is another debate.
