Curio LP

[ApocalypsePlease]

blah

more blah

yeah but you aren't multiplying by 100% or 360%, you're multiplying by 1 or 3.6, respectively

100% = x1
360% = x3.6

I must say it's all about phrasing, the RoB wiki page on it doesn't even notate learning ability directly in the formula, and just mentions after that LP gain is modified by it

[sabinati]

what you're doing is implying the /100 there

[ApocalypsePlease]

That's just how you convert the two I'm aware.

(This is getting nowhere I know where you're coming from and just speaking on how it could be phrased)

[eliminoid]

Hi.
There is definetly an error in formula.
Tangled Bramble, q21: 5216 LP (1000*sqrt(2.1)*3.6=5216)
But I have gained something like 4700 LP when I logged in the game.

[Procne]

Maybe base LP for tangled bramble is 900, and not 1000?
Maybe your learning ability is not 360%?
Maybe bramble's quality was not 21?
Maybe you didn't see the number properly or it wasn't the number which you think it was?

There are many things that could be wrong, I wouldn't start with the formula, because it actually is least probable. If it was wrong then I'm sure it would have been reported already

[eliminoid]

Okay, I will find another one and post the result of my research here.

[ApocalypsePlease]

Also, afaik the game doesn't round any of the values except the end result, so try not to round

[rye130]

Percent - Per Cent - Per 100 - divide by 100

360% is literally 360/100 which is 3.6. You get 3.6 times as many whatevers.

Bam, now we all understand what the word percent means.

[ApocalypsePlease]

Percent - Per Cent - Per 100 - divide by 100

360% is literally 360/100 which is 3.6. You get 3.6 times as many whatevers.

Bam, now we all understand what the word percent means.

I must say it's all about phrasing,

[eliminoid]

You were right. It seems that the tangled bramble is around 950 base lp. The formula works correctly for other curios.