nawatedisu wrote:I honestly wouldn't mind PvP if everyone wasn't so fucking hostile in the game.
"I honestly wouldn't mind PvP if people wouldn't fight each other =_="
"I honestly wouldn't mind PvP if it wasn't Player versus Player =_="
And Harry is intelligent.
Hostility is different from fighting. If there was a reason for hostility then it could be understandable, unfortunately it is not. Therefore, like I said.. if everyone wasn't so needlessly hostile in the game, and fought for certain reasons that were logical and reasonable, then I wouldn't have a problem with it. It's not that way though, now is it?
borka wrote:You should be aware that the majority of players isn't hostile...
I've met one person that wasn't hostile. Later that day, I found out he was killed. Every other player that I've met was hostile (20+ players in this world, and also a bunch more in the past worlds). It's not balanced.
nawatedisu wrote:I honestly wouldn't mind PvP if everyone wasn't so fucking hostile in the game.
"I honestly wouldn't mind PvP if people wouldn't fight each other =_="
"I honestly wouldn't mind PvP if it wasn't Player versus Player =_="
And Harry is intelligent.
Hostility is different from fighting. If there was a reason for hostility then it could be understandable, unfortunately it is not. Therefore, like I said.. if everyone wasn't so needlessly hostile in the game, and fought for certain reasons that were logical and reasonable, then I wouldn't have a problem with it. It's not that way though, now is it?
They fight for logical reasons:
They want to have fun, they want your gear, they want to assert dominance.
If PvP was disabled, or limited to "spars" like in WoW, there would be no danger and PvP as we know it wouldn't be here.
Jalpha wrote:I believe in my interpretation of things.
nawatedisu wrote:
Hostility is different from fighting. If there was a reason for hostility then it could be understandable, unfortunately it is not. Therefore, like I said.. if everyone wasn't so needlessly hostile in the game, and fought for certain reasons that were logical and reasonable, then I wouldn't have a problem with it. It's not that way though, now is it?
They fight for logical reasons:
They want to have fun, they want your gear, they want to assert dominance.
If PvP was disabled, or limited to "spars" like in WoW, there would be no danger and PvP as we know it wouldn't be here.
I've seen many noobs get murdered and they had nothing. Having fun isn't a logical reason, nor is "asserting dominance". Those aren't logical things, they're rather illogical.
nawatedisu wrote:
Hostility is different from fighting. If there was a reason for hostility then it could be understandable, unfortunately it is not. Therefore, like I said.. if everyone wasn't so needlessly hostile in the game, and fought for certain reasons that were logical and reasonable, then I wouldn't have a problem with it. It's not that way though, now is it?
They fight for logical reasons:
They want to have fun, they want your gear, they want to assert dominance.
If PvP was disabled, or limited to "spars" like in WoW, there would be no danger and PvP as we know it wouldn't be here.
I've seen many noobs get murdered and they had nothing. Having fun isn't a logical reason, nor is "asserting dominance". Those aren't logical things, they're rather illogical.
Can you explain why they're 'rather illogical'...?
It's a game where people want 2 things: Victory and fun.
They have fun killing you.
They feel like they just won when they kill you.
This is the most logical reason I've ever seen...
Jalpha wrote:I believe in my interpretation of things.
nawatedisu wrote:
I've seen many noobs get murdered and they had nothing. Having fun isn't a logical reason, nor is "asserting dominance". Those aren't logical things, they're rather illogical.
Can you explain why they're 'rather illogical'...?
It's a game where people want 2 things: Victory and fun.
They have fun killing you.
They feel like they just won when they kill you.
This is the most logical reason I've ever seen...
Having fun at an other person's expense is illogical, no matter which way you look at it.
