All trees should have boughs

Thoughts on the further development of Haven & Hearth? Feel free to opine!
User avatar
Lunarius_Haberdash
Posts: 1477
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:14 am

Re: All trees should have boughs

Post by Lunarius_Haberdash »

MooCow wrote:As a person who knows basically nothing about trees, boughs, and thatching . What makes a tree good or bad for this purpose?
The denseness of the ancillary branches, resilience of the leaves (Which is why evergreens are ideal), water resistance, the durability of the structure when dried (Some branches suck), flexibility of the branches in both the dried and undried state.

Also - Be glad he doesn't require us to put bracken down before we put down thatching. By all rights, we should have to gather nettles and ferns to lay under the thatching to ensure its weather tight.

I could, however, accept all trees having boughs under one condition. That some of them weren't good for thatching but were excellent for use as tree hay. (Fun fact: Animals eat grasses because that's what we feed them. Cows and the like are perfectly capable of eating and enjoying supple branches and foliage from trees.)
jorb: I don't want *your* money. You are rude and boring. Go away.
Sevenless: We already know real life has some pretty shitty game mechanics, it's why we're here instead.
Avu: The end is near it has finally come to pass: I agree with Lunarius...
Shubla: There are also other reasons to play this game than to maximize your stat gain.
MooCow
Posts: 277
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 7:35 pm

Re: All trees should have boughs

Post by MooCow »

Thank you for the insight!

Personally, I would find it confusing if only some boughs where good for thatching and I greatly enjoy a lot of the subtle realism in the game. If we did get boughs from other trees, it would probably be better if they were called something else.

I would prefer getting access to better colors through the addition of wood and clay roofs
User avatar
dageir
Posts: 1973
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 12:37 pm

Re: All trees should have boughs

Post by dageir »

Spruce, fir etc do not have leaves!
Have you guys ever been outside?
Image
User avatar
Lunarius_Haberdash
Posts: 1477
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:14 am

Re: All trees should have boughs

Post by Lunarius_Haberdash »

dageir wrote:Spruce, fir etc do not have leaves!
Have you guys ever been outside?
Spruce/Fir/Pine all have leaves they're simply shaped like needles and commonly referred to as such. Still leaves.
jorb: I don't want *your* money. You are rude and boring. Go away.
Sevenless: We already know real life has some pretty shitty game mechanics, it's why we're here instead.
Avu: The end is near it has finally come to pass: I agree with Lunarius...
Shubla: There are also other reasons to play this game than to maximize your stat gain.
User avatar
dageir
Posts: 1973
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 12:37 pm

Re: All trees should have boughs

Post by dageir »

Lunarius_Haberdash wrote:
dageir wrote:Spruce, fir etc do not have leaves!
Have you guys ever been outside?
Spruce/Fir/Pine all have leaves they're simply shaped like needles and commonly referred to as such. Still leaves.
In a scientific sense you are right. I am not a native English speaker so I do not know if it is common to say spruce leaves.
Anyone know?
Image
User avatar
vatas
Posts: 5255
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 8:34 am
Location: Suomi Finland Perkele

Re: All trees should have boughs

Post by vatas »

Depending on the craft, boughs represent both branches with significant amount of leaves or needles on it and just longer/thicker branches in general. Latter could be reasonably extracted in almost any tree but unfortunately I don't see any efficient way of adding this to the game without massive tree rework that unfortunately can't be put high at all in grand scheme of things.
Haven and Hearth Wiki (Maintained by volunteers - test/verify when practical. Forum thread

Basic Claim Safety (And what you’re doing wrong
TL:;DR: Build a Palisade with only Visitor gates.)

Combat Guide (Overview, PVE, PVP) (Includes how to escape/minimize risk of getting killed.)
MooCow
Posts: 277
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 7:35 pm

Re: All trees should have boughs

Post by MooCow »

dageir wrote:In a scientific sense you are right. I am not a native English speaker so I do not know if it is common to say spruce leaves.
Anyone know?
If you said "spruce leaves", people would know what you are talking about. If you said "maple needles", people would be pretty confused.

It isn't at all common to say spruce leaves. The only exception is if you were talking about the leaves of a maple in contrast to the needles spruce, you would probably just call them all leaves like Lunarius did.

If you looked up needles in the dictionary, it would probably have zero references to trees, and leaves.
User avatar
MagicManICT
Posts: 18435
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:47 am

Re: All trees should have boughs

Post by MagicManICT »

vatas wrote:Depending on the craft, boughs represent both branches with significant amount of leaves or needles on it and just longer/thicker branches in general. Latter could be reasonably extracted in almost any tree[...].
Not really. A lot of trees have branches that fork quite frequently relative to other species, and the only straight pieces of wood you're going to get are going to need a saw to cut off large limbs. Oak comes to mind; maple is another. I'm sure we could go down the list of trees and check on what, exactly would fit to be a "bough." Some might not be useful for some crafting purposes, some might not be useful as a thatching material. Several aren't going to be useful at all.
Opinions expressed in this statement are the authors alone and in no way reflect on the game development values of the actual developers.

Return to “Critique & Ideas”