Nah wont happen.I just always find those pro- and anti- judaean debates interesting as a political scientist. Everyone seems to be so inclined on takin a strong opinion, that facts seem to barely matter. Even better that the difficulty to judge those facts intersubjective does not occur to anyone and instead bashing the opposite faction is much more interesting, albeit from political reality.Potjeh wrote:Heh, I wonder how long till your ISP blocks this site, Burg. I'm betting when someone denies holocaust.
-
burgingham
- Posts: 8486
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:58 pm
Re: The Middle-East and Arab-Israeli debate
Last edited by burgingham on Thu Apr 29, 2010 2:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Elirian
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 5:20 pm
Re: The Middle-East and Arab-Israeli debate
Everyone wants to be a political cheerleader nowadays. It's not really about taking the best course for most people, it's about beating the bad guys and saving the day.burgingham wrote:Nah wont happen.I just always find those pro- and anti- judaean debates interesting as a political scientist. Everyone seems so inclined on takin a strong opinion, that facts seem to barely matter. Even better that the difficulty to judge those facts intersubjective does not occur to anyone and instead bashing the opposite faction is much more interesting, albeit from political reality.Potjeh wrote:Heh, I wonder how long till your ISP blocks this site, Burg. I'm betting when someone denies holocaust.
-
Granger
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 2:00 pm
Re: The Middle-East and Arab-Israeli debate
While you have a valid point there i see the problem that you'll have to selectively mindwipe the whole planet to make that happen (since in areas like middle east way to many are that full of hatret that the only option left for them is to repeat the past over and over again) and in case such a technology will come into existance it'll be used for evil (take advertising as a mild example of what will happen).Ferinex wrote:The idea that the suffering and victimization of a people in the past should be used as justification for the displacement of another race is absurd. Israel and the Zionists/Jews are forcing individuals from their homes, using their own rape as moralization. If a people or idea is incapable of surviving and coexisting with the other ideologies of the world, then that is merely a form of social evolution. That is not to say that the Jewish religion and people are incapable of existing peacefully in this world--they most definitely are. Many Western countries have freedoms that guarantee the Semites (and all others) the right to live and worship. Just as there should not be a pure German nation, there should be no pure Jewish nation. A people does not 'earn' the right to take others' land by being beaten up throughout history--you can not hold any man responsible for the sins of his father.
Now, let me clarify: I am not saying the Jews should 'gtfo' of Israel. I am saying that if they wish to live there, they need to coexist with the Arab population. Just as the Turks living in Germany should not expect to claim Germany as 'New Turkey', the Zionists in Palestine should not be claiming Palestine as their own.
β Mon Mar 22, 2010 β Thu Jan 23, 2020
-
KillerofLawyers
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:00 am
The Middle-East and Arab-Israeli debate
Why is the fate of two small countries significant? Their survival doesn't mean anything for our survival.
And there are plenty of other places in the world where suffering and conflict is the norm. I suppose the only good reason to support Israel is because they do develop some effective weapons.
And there are plenty of other places in the world where suffering and conflict is the norm. I suppose the only good reason to support Israel is because they do develop some effective weapons.
-
Elirian
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 5:20 pm
Re: The Middle-East and Arab-Israeli debate
If only butterflies had no wings, the weather would always be sunny. It's simplistic to say that anything has no bearing on your survival.KillerofLawyers wrote:Their survival doesn't mean anything for our survival.
Aside from which, survival alone is an animals moral imperative, not that of a man. Despite what the current trend in pop philosophy teaches
Perhaps a better analogy would be 'without a bowl I can't have cereal+milk, therefore I want an empty bowl for breakfast'.
-
Sarge
- Posts: 2059
- Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 3:41 am
Re: The Middle-East and Arab-Israeli debate
Clearly I do not share the passion for history you show here, but maybe it would have been very different if this was 'closer to home for me'... I find this as interesting as watching grass grow... different strokes for different folks I suppose. (No malicious or offensive intent, just expressing my (non) opinion)
factnfiction101 wrote:^I agree with this guy.
-
eql
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 3:39 am
Re: The Middle-East and Arab-Israeli debate
ha this is so true.burgingham wrote:Everyone seems to be so inclined on takin a strong opinion, that facts seem to barely matter. Even better that the difficulty to judge those facts intersubjective does not occur to anyone and instead bashing the opposite faction is much more interesting, albeit from political reality.Potjeh wrote:Heh, I wonder how long till your ISP blocks this site, Burg. I'm betting when someone denies holocaust.
Has anyone bothered to mention that it was the wwii coalition that pretty much setup israel? if they hadnt gotten so involved i think there might of been some kind of unity on that crap piece of land.
edit: after reading some of loftorbs post...
do you honestly believe that the jews are battling to survive? Israel is a rich and highly protected nation, they are pretty much untouchable and have been thriving since Israel inception.