Woops, I was ssh'd into a remote box that apparently doesn't like IPv6.loftar wrote:Isn't that just you having some sort of IPv6 trouble? Isn't it the same over IPv6 for the German address?strpk0 wrote:Destination unreachable: Address unreachable
-
strpk0
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 11:44 pm
Re: Germany or Finland for servers?
Granger wrote:Fuck off, please go grow yourself some decency.
-
Sevenless
- Posts: 7704
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 3:55 am
- Location: Canada
Re: Germany or Finland for servers?
Ontario Canada.
Germany: 137ms
Finland: 155ms
I'm surprised anyone from NA is getting better results from finland, it's significantly further away than germany is.
Germany: 137ms
Finland: 155ms
I'm surprised anyone from NA is getting better results from finland, it's significantly further away than germany is.
Lucky: haven is so quirky
Lucky: can be so ugly, can be so heartwarming
Sevenless: it is life
The Art of Herding
W16 Farmer's Almanac
W16 Casting Rod Cheatsheet
Explanation of the logic behind the cooking system
Lucky: can be so ugly, can be so heartwarming
Sevenless: it is life
The Art of Herding
W16 Farmer's Almanac
W16 Casting Rod Cheatsheet
Explanation of the logic behind the cooking system
-
MightySheep
- Posts: 2535
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 1:18 pm
Re: Germany or Finland for servers?
In the UK I got around 30ms to Germany and 44ms to Finland

I did it a few times

I did it a few times
Last edited by MightySheep on Fri Oct 27, 2023 7:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
maze
- Posts: 2819
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 3:15 am
- Location: Canada
-
DDDsDD999
- Posts: 5766
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 12:31 am
-
HarryDresden
- Posts: 1113
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 12:10 am
Re: Germany or Finland for servers?
Pinging from California; 180ms for Germany, 185 for Finland.
Yes, I am a Wizard.
loftar wrote: bear fruit is not something I can predict,.
Beborn Beton wrote: "Don't Worry, They Won't Find My Body, I Want You To Know I Found Peace In Another World."
-
Kearn
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:09 am
Re: Germany or Finland for servers?
EST, 140 ms germany 144 ms finland
-
Potjeh
- Posts: 11825
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm
Re: Germany or Finland for servers?
From Bosnia it's 40ms to Germany and 59ms to Finland.
-
Joe69
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:34 am
Re: Germany or Finland for servers?
England
Code: Select all
C:\>ping fsn.icmp.hetzner.com
Pinging fsn.icmp.hetzner.com [2a01:4f8:0:a232::2] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 2a01:4f8:0:a232::2: time=29ms
Reply from 2a01:4f8:0:a232::2: time=30ms
Reply from 2a01:4f8:0:a232::2: time=30ms
Reply from 2a01:4f8:0:a232::2: time=29ms
Ping statistics for 2a01:4f8:0:a232::2:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 29ms, Maximum = 30ms, Average = 29ms
C:\>ping hel.icmp.hetzner.com
Pinging hel.icmp.hetzner.com [2a01:4f9:0:a010::20] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 2a01:4f9:0:a010::20: time=43ms
Reply from 2a01:4f9:0:a010::20: time=44ms
Reply from 2a01:4f9:0:a010::20: time=43ms
Reply from 2a01:4f9:0:a010::20: time=43ms
Ping statistics for 2a01:4f9:0:a010::20:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 43ms, Maximum = 44ms, Average = 43msI fully look forward to jorb and loftar fixing several mechanics and bringing back updates, because at that time you chuckleheads are going to be more marginalized than lawn furniture in winter.
-
yllet
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 11:15 pm
Re: Germany or Finland for servers?
Hel1 is clearly superior. ( no relation to me being in southern Finland)
Though <2ms or ~26ms, makes no real difference.
PING hel.icmp.hetzner.com (95.217.255.81) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from hel1-speed.hetzner.com (95.217.255.81): icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=1.71 ms
64 bytes from hel1-speed.hetzner.com (95.217.255.81): icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=1.68 ms
64 bytes from hel1-speed.hetzner.com (95.217.255.81): icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=1.66 ms
64 bytes from hel1-speed.hetzner.com (95.217.255.81): icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=1.55 ms
64 bytes from hel1-speed.hetzner.com (95.217.255.81): icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=1.51 ms
64 bytes from hel1-speed.hetzner.com (95.217.255.81): icmp_seq=6 ttl=56 time=1.52 ms
PING fsn.icmp.hetzner.com (78.46.170.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fsn1-speed.hetzner.com (78.46.170.2): icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=26.2 ms
64 bytes from fsn1-speed.hetzner.com (78.46.170.2): icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=26.2 ms
64 bytes from fsn1-speed.hetzner.com (78.46.170.2): icmp_seq=4 ttl=53 time=26.2 ms
64 bytes from fsn1-speed.hetzner.com (78.46.170.2): icmp_seq=5 ttl=53 time=26.2 ms
64 bytes from fsn1-speed.hetzner.com (78.46.170.2): icmp_seq=6 ttl=53 time=26.0 ms
Though <2ms or ~26ms, makes no real difference.
PING hel.icmp.hetzner.com (95.217.255.81) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from hel1-speed.hetzner.com (95.217.255.81): icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=1.71 ms
64 bytes from hel1-speed.hetzner.com (95.217.255.81): icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=1.68 ms
64 bytes from hel1-speed.hetzner.com (95.217.255.81): icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=1.66 ms
64 bytes from hel1-speed.hetzner.com (95.217.255.81): icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=1.55 ms
64 bytes from hel1-speed.hetzner.com (95.217.255.81): icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=1.51 ms
64 bytes from hel1-speed.hetzner.com (95.217.255.81): icmp_seq=6 ttl=56 time=1.52 ms
PING fsn.icmp.hetzner.com (78.46.170.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fsn1-speed.hetzner.com (78.46.170.2): icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=26.2 ms
64 bytes from fsn1-speed.hetzner.com (78.46.170.2): icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=26.2 ms
64 bytes from fsn1-speed.hetzner.com (78.46.170.2): icmp_seq=4 ttl=53 time=26.2 ms
64 bytes from fsn1-speed.hetzner.com (78.46.170.2): icmp_seq=5 ttl=53 time=26.2 ms
64 bytes from fsn1-speed.hetzner.com (78.46.170.2): icmp_seq=6 ttl=53 time=26.0 ms





