Game Development: A Far Green Country

Announcements about major changes in Haven & Hearth.
Ragnar214
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 11:09 pm

Re: Game Development: A Far Green Country

Post by Ragnar214 »

Ralek wrote: It's not speculation and you knew it was coming? I'm adding you to my "Masters of the Minds" list where your facts are obtained from thin air, no dev posts to back anything you're saying, which should be easily accessible according to you. Your 'he/she said' defense isn't working, so you should get busy too and play the game and leave the devs to defend themselves. :roll:

Also, stop quoting everything.
You know what IS speculation? Is that you speculate how the game is monetized is up to you.
LukeSkywalker
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:30 am

Re: Game Development: A Far Green Country

Post by LukeSkywalker »

Ragnar214 wrote:
Ralek wrote: It's not speculation and you knew it was coming? I'm adding you to my "Masters of the Minds" list where your facts are obtained from thin air, no dev posts to back anything you're saying, which should be easily accessible according to you. Your 'he/she said' defense isn't working, so you should get busy too and play the game and leave the devs to defend themselves. :roll:

Also, stop quoting everything.
You know what IS speculation? Is that you speculate how the game is monetized is up to you.
But it really is up to the playerbase, if they leave there's nothing to monetize. :roll:
Ragnar214
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 11:09 pm

Re: Game Development: A Far Green Country

Post by Ragnar214 »

There are 775 hearthlings playing.
User avatar
whitdemon
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 4:05 am

Re: Game Development: A Far Green Country

Post by whitdemon »

Ragnar214 wrote:There are 775 hearthlings playing.

try doing the same in a week
Morpheus: I imagine that right now, you're feeling a bit like Alice. Hmm? Tumbling down the rabbit hole?
Neo: You could say that.
Morpheus: I see it in your eyes. You have the look of a man who accepts what he sees because he is expecting to wake up. Ironically, that's not far from the truth. Do you believe in fate, Neo?
Neo: No.
ItsFunToLose
Posts: 264
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 10:18 pm

Re: Game Development: A Far Green Country

Post by ItsFunToLose »

Ragnar214 wrote:There are 775 hearthlings playing.
I am quoting this 2 weeks from now, taking a screen shot, printing it out, and mailing it to you.

so you can shove it up your ass.
I like to air dribble.
User avatar
whitdemon
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 4:05 am

Re: Game Development: A Far Green Country

Post by whitdemon »

ItsFunToLose wrote:
Ragnar214 wrote:There are 775 hearthlings playing.
I am quoting this 2 weeks from now, taking a screen shot, printing it out, and mailing it to you.

so you can shove it up your ass.

Thats so likelly as my ass growing teeth...
Last edited by whitdemon on Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Morpheus: I imagine that right now, you're feeling a bit like Alice. Hmm? Tumbling down the rabbit hole?
Neo: You could say that.
Morpheus: I see it in your eyes. You have the look of a man who accepts what he sees because he is expecting to wake up. Ironically, that's not far from the truth. Do you believe in fate, Neo?
Neo: No.
Dethguise
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu May 02, 2013 3:24 am

Re: Game Development: A Far Green Country

Post by Dethguise »

So are we done with this yet. I'd prefer to not dig through pages of shitposting and by the way a thread was made to discuss the p2p so move this crap over there at least
ItsFunToLose
Posts: 264
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 10:18 pm

Re: Game Development: A Far Green Country

Post by ItsFunToLose »

reading this thread is more entertaining than actually playing the game, knowing that in a matter of weeks, it's going to be dead. I, like many others here, had a group of friends hyped and ready to play day one, only to get reamed. I've put hundreds of hours in and love it for the niche charm it possesses; they look at the game and see it for what it truly is: a hot java mess not worth a subscription. "sorry, i can't get in to this if we have to pay monthly, let's play some league/hots/counterstrike"

the point is not that the game costs money, I'd gladly have payed. it's that it was not announced. and it's using an archaic subscription model reserved for dying, AAA-as-of-15-years-ago games.

you can't put a price on communicating with your community properly. And as much as I respect jorb for his tongue-in-cheek responses to the shit bags that play this game, mistakes were made.

I really hope I'm wrong, and 6 months from now this game is thriving and has 1000+ people playing, no bots, etc etc, but I don't see how.

It's not that I don't want to pay 72$ for a year's subscription, it's that I have no faith in the longevity of this game given the form of monetization chosen, and the way it was implemented.
and without an active user base, people you can run in to and interact with on a consistent basis, then it's just not worth my time, as a free game, let alone my money.
I like to air dribble.
Ragnar214
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 11:09 pm

Re: Game Development: A Far Green Country

Post by Ragnar214 »

Dethguise wrote:So are we done with this yet. I'd prefer to not dig through pages of shitposting and by the way a thread was made to discuss the p2p so move this crap over there at least

Agreed
Ragnar214
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 11:09 pm

Re: Game Development: A Far Green Country

Post by Ragnar214 »

ItsFunToLose wrote:reading this thread is more entertaining than actually playing the game, knowing that in a matter of weeks, it's going to be dead. I, like many others here, had a group of friends hyped and ready to play day one, only to get reamed. I've put hundreds of hours in and love it for the niche charm it possesses; they look at the game and see it for what it truly is: a hot java mess not worth a subscription. "sorry, i can't get in to this if we have to pay monthly, let's play some league/hots/counterstrike"

the point is not that the game costs money, I'd gladly have payed. it's that it was not announced. and it's using an archaic subscription model reserved for dying, AAA-as-of-15-years-ago games.

you can't put a price on communicating with your community properly. And as much as I respect jorb for his tongue-in-cheek responses to the shit bags that play this game, mistakes were made.

I really hope I'm wrong, and 6 months from now this game is thriving and has 1000+ people playing, no bots, etc etc, but I don't see how.

It's not that I don't want to pay 72$ for a year's subscription, it's that I have no faith in the longevity of this game given the form of monetization chosen, and the way it was implemented.
and without an active user base, people you can run in to and interact with on a consistent basis, then it's just not worth my time, as a free game, let alone my money.
Just shaddddup already its been said 100 times.

If its not worth it than shut up, stop repeating yourselves and go play a game made by lesser intelligent devs.

Return to “Announcements”