Merged. (not sure how I missed it when this this thread originally got posted.)2d0x wrote:http://www.havenandhearth.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=44509
Definitely would be a good thing for the community, I think.
Merged. (not sure how I missed it when this this thread originally got posted.)2d0x wrote:http://www.havenandhearth.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=44509
It would verify that the account owner has put a bit of money towards the developers and thus is eligible for the boni (increased inventory, convenience, learning speed and access to Legacy while that lasts) that are the perks of a verified account.pppp wrote:Can someone enlighten me what a verification token would verify, exactly ?
That is the current state. I was asking what would it verify when it becomes an ingame item that can be transferred by means of trade, theft, scamming, blackmail, etc.Granger wrote: It would verify that the account owner has put a bit of money towards the developers
Bad idea.vnsmirnov wrote:Give the opportunity to divide the token into one hundred subscription coins. They can be used as play money, changed and collected back into a token (100 coins) or a verification token (150-200 coins).

That's a cool idea but im 100% sure if that was a thing then there would be no other trading than token trading, game would be 100% pay2win then for hermits that can't gather anything valuable cuz their quality sucksvnsmirnov wrote:Give the opportunity to divide the token into one hundred subscription coins. They can be used as play money, changed and collected back into a token (100 coins) or a verification token (150-200 coins).
epicbuds wrote:just got this game a bad review on my website and will post on every forum and game page i can think of to tell people to stay away from this site this game is a joke
viruseg wrote:Kill all new players for no reason. Polish scum came running and killed me with a crowd. Suck fuck fucks..
Granger wrote:It would verify that the account owner has put a bit of money
These statements contradict each other. I was not asking what it would give to the account that is using verification token because that is well known. I was asking what would be verified in this case, because certainly it would not verify account owner identity nor the fact he is a true customer. Would calling it "verification" still made sense? It should be just "paid, permanent account upgrade".Granger wrote:Still the same thing, possibly with someone else having paid the price.
Effect would still be identical.
Yes, this.Ozzy123 wrote:pay2win