Oh god, did you get offended by me pointing out that you have no moral high ground in suggesting improvements for hafen? It's so fun hearing that you are trying to make the things better by suggesting the utter rubbish solutions that are completely disconnected from the game dynamics, historical precedents, economics, social interactions and etc.Granger wrote:Nice display of todays (sadly quite often usual) 'discussion' strategy of attacking the person when you're unable to come up with arguments against what they're saying.LadyGoo wrote:[the usual ad hominem]
My arguments are simple:
-it did not work in the past, so the new solutions should be considered;
-cap is a cap no matter how you put it;
-whenever you slow down factions, you are slowing down everyone;
-decay is shit and proven to be shit in W3 and been removed by the devs, the devs also expressed they do not want it.
Your arguments:
-oh, we'll make the limits a bit bigger. It will work! Your precedent is shit and is no proof, my IDEA is amazing cus I said so. Now, it will work just because instead of 330 we'll have 3300!;
-decay will work just because I said so. The game should be tedious for the ones who are playing for the sake of excelling in a game. I hate the factions and wanna oppose them in any way I can, since they took my salt nodes I've claimed in W9, cry-cry. I do not care that the devs do not like it. It will work and make everything better (for the whiners like me that barely play or have any social interactions).
