Thought he was safe. Wrong-o.

[ARCHIVE FOR WORLD 3]Forum for discussing in game politics, village relations and matters of justice.
User avatar
WarpedWiseMan
Posts: 1059
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 8:34 pm
Location: A throne.

Re: Thought he was safe. Wrong-o.

Post by WarpedWiseMan »

Sotsa wrote:
Bismarck wrote:Post some pictures from when you griefed that guy's place. :D
They didn't 'grief' his place.
No, we don't grief unless grief'd upon. Instead, we, as in the people who were involved not myself as I had pressing wheat matters to attend to, leveled it to the ground as thoroughly as possible.
btaylor wrote:I have learned that the game doesn't follow the principles of mathematics. If you want something and the game is in a good mood you can get it, whatever it is. More often than not, however, the game wants you to die.
-Avatar by SacreDoom

Image
User avatar
Sarchi
Posts: 2517
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 1:14 am
Location: 109, -37

Re: Thought he was safe. Wrong-o.

Post by Sarchi »

I think Bismarck's confused over what the term 'grief' really means. I think he just defines 'griefing' as destroying the person's stuff.
User avatar
Handofevil
Posts: 152
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 3:46 am

Re: Thought he was safe. Wrong-o.

Post by Handofevil »

My internet finally stopped being a piece of crap and let me upload the pictures. Here they are.
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

The odd thing is that the brick wall came down in about 1-2 minutes which they say is much quicker then normal.
NaoWhut wrote: a nice juicy jorb dong.
Vengeance959
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 1:33 am

Re: Thought he was safe. Wrong-o.

Post by Vengeance959 »

So thats what scents look like :o. Nice job btw in ridding yourselfs of a griefer. I'd give you beer but I don't have any so will a congradulations work?
User avatar
Sarchi
Posts: 2517
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 1:14 am
Location: 109, -37

Re: Thought he was safe. Wrong-o.

Post by Sarchi »

Haha, that's really awesome.

What now? I personally think that you should village claim the entire area so they can't log back in without going to the wilderness or whatever.

Then you can fix the brick wall and shit and have a fortress and an extra mine. ;)

If nothing else, you could just do that and sell it off to someone else for a profit.
User avatar
Handofevil
Posts: 152
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 3:46 am

Re: Thought he was safe. Wrong-o.

Post by Handofevil »

the problem is is that we don't have the keys to either of the gates except the ones we built. None of the key molds we found fit them either. But still, you do have a point.
SamPerson
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 6:13 am

Re: Thought he was safe. Wrong-o.

Post by SamPerson »

I think it a little similar on justice. :idea: :?: :!: More similar on a mine gain....
User avatar
ElGato
Posts: 1945
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 2:10 am

Re: Thought he was safe. Wrong-o.

Post by ElGato »

Pro palesade destroying to get to ram
burgingham wrote:We are all Gato, and Gato is Delamore of course. Goons blablabla...
Caradon wrote:Gato, the anti-ghandi
Sabinati wrote:yeah we're gonna kill you gato!!!
User avatar
burgingham
Posts: 8486
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:58 pm

Re: Thought he was safe. Wrong-o.

Post by burgingham »

Sarchi wrote:I think Bismarck's confused over what the term 'grief' really means. I think he just defines 'griefing' as destroying the person's stuff.
:roll:
User avatar
Deadlift_pro
Posts: 416
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 6:49 pm

Re: Thought he was safe. Wrong-o.

Post by Deadlift_pro »

I've griefed more than a few villages/people in my time, the destruction is parallel to what I used to do.
Go go griefer rangers!

Return to “[ARCHIVE]In Congress Assembled”