-
Igglebert
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:50 pm
Re: Thoughtful Criticism For The New LP System
ITT: Butthurt noobs who cant grind LP to go out and murder noobs 
-
Zampfeo
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:30 pm
- Location: USA
Re: Thoughtful Criticism For The New LP System
More like butt hurt that someone who plays 10% of the time I do can have the same LP as I.Igglebert wrote:ITT: Butthurt noobs who cant grind LP to go out and murder noobs
-
Potjeh
- Posts: 11825
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm
Re: Thoughtful Criticism For The New LP System
Except they can't, since you have to play a lot to actually get any decent curiosities.
-
Zampfeo
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:30 pm
- Location: USA
Re: Thoughtful Criticism For The New LP System
All have you have to do is log on every hour or so for a few minutes to put on a new ant or cow cone.Potjeh wrote:Except they can't, since you have to play a lot to actually get any decent curiosities.
-
evilrich
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 5:13 pm
Re: Thoughtful Criticism For The New LP System
so... blah blah blah winge winge. if u dont like the way the devs do it, go play another game?overlordror wrote:Jackard, if the devs are against banning then there really is no place for them to be developing an MMO (no matter how great the concept). Bad actions always have consequences and if Loftar & Jorb are not willing to take a stand against those who don't play without mechanical assistance, then the game is fundamentally flawed no matter what LP system is in place.
When Salem is fully developed you can bet your ass 100 percent that Paradox will enforce bans for anyone perceived as cheating the system.
-
Potjeh
- Posts: 11825
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm
Re: Thoughtful Criticism For The New LP System
And you actually think you can compete using such low tier curiosities? That's like using roast boar to compete against MBC.Zampfeo wrote:All have you have to do is log on every hour or so for a few minutes to put on a new ant or cow cone.Potjeh wrote:Except they can't, since you have to play a lot to actually get any decent curiosities.
-
LimaZulu
- Posts: 959
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:28 am
Re: Thoughtful Criticism For The New LP System
There is no need to compete in our great society.Potjeh wrote:And you actually think you can compete using such low tier curiosities? That's like using roast boar to compete against MBC.Zampfeo wrote:All have you have to do is log on every hour or so for a few minutes to put on a new ant or cow cone.Potjeh wrote:Except they can't, since you have to play a lot to actually get any decent curiosities.
-
Zampfeo
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:30 pm
- Location: USA
Re: Thoughtful Criticism For The New LP System
I'm talking about early game. Getting that high Q place claimed isn't about diligence anymore. It doesn't matter how long you're on or how hard you work.Potjeh wrote:And you actually think you can compete using such low tier curiosities? That's like using roast boar to compete against MBC.Zampfeo wrote:All have you have to do is log on every hour or so for a few minutes to put on a new ant or cow cone.Potjeh wrote:Except they can't, since you have to play a lot to actually get any decent curiosities.
-
dra6o0n
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 3:11 am
Re: Thoughtful Criticism For The New LP System
Jackard's views are always one sided you noticed?
There is no such as as an absolute problem, that when fixed, will solve everything.
I see it as a magnitude size of combined problems, that unless fixed in a specific way, will regenerate and grow like bacteria.
Implementing the new lp system basically fixed one problem, and created another, as that's how the newton's laws of physics come into play.
For every action there is a equal or greater reaction.
Then now for the current system, we can use Murphy's law ("Whatever can happen, will happen") to say that the worst that haven't happen yet, will happen.
The LP system interesting for everyone, although having a big drawback, and some thinks it's not the worst that can happen. Touche to being hopeful, because the worst has yet to come.
The fact that this community is a 3 (If i were to say communities can be rated and policed up to 10 for the best) makes confronting the problem a bigger hassle than you might think. Yes short form is, the bad parts of the community will prevent the game from growing.
Yes, the devs can focus on making better designs, but their willpower and devotion is based on the community's attention span, which seems to be dropping quickly.
You can't create a game for everyone, if everyone doesn't want to play it. You can't design and come up with creative innovation without other people.
There is no such as as an absolute problem, that when fixed, will solve everything.
I see it as a magnitude size of combined problems, that unless fixed in a specific way, will regenerate and grow like bacteria.
Implementing the new lp system basically fixed one problem, and created another, as that's how the newton's laws of physics come into play.
For every action there is a equal or greater reaction.
Then now for the current system, we can use Murphy's law ("Whatever can happen, will happen") to say that the worst that haven't happen yet, will happen.
The LP system interesting for everyone, although having a big drawback, and some thinks it's not the worst that can happen. Touche to being hopeful, because the worst has yet to come.
The fact that this community is a 3 (If i were to say communities can be rated and policed up to 10 for the best) makes confronting the problem a bigger hassle than you might think. Yes short form is, the bad parts of the community will prevent the game from growing.
See what I mean? Thanks to this individual, that's one less player in the community, and while you might think that's a good thing, it is not because those that reads it will surely get pissed off and results in much more than one person being gone. It also deters more people to join the game because of word of mouth from those who had bad experiences with it.evilrich wrote:so... blah blah blah winge winge. if u dont like the way the devs do it, go play another game?overlordror wrote:Jackard, if the devs are against banning then there really is no place for them to be developing an MMO (no matter how great the concept). Bad actions always have consequences and if Loftar & Jorb are not willing to take a stand against those who don't play without mechanical assistance, then the game is fundamentally flawed no matter what LP system is in place.
When Salem is fully developed you can bet your ass 100 percent that Paradox will enforce bans for anyone perceived as cheating the system.
Yes, the devs can focus on making better designs, but their willpower and devotion is based on the community's attention span, which seems to be dropping quickly.
You can't create a game for everyone, if everyone doesn't want to play it. You can't design and come up with creative innovation without other people.
Last edited by dra6o0n on Sun Mar 13, 2011 8:26 pm, edited 2 times in total.